Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39656090›Full record

ArticleeLife2024

Semantic relatedness proactively benefits learning, memory, and interdependence across episodes.

Kelly A Bennion, Jade Phong, Mytien Le, Kunhua Cheng, Christopher N Wahlheim, James W Antony

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kelly A BennionDepartment of Psychology and Child Development, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3301-7744
Jade PhongDepartment of Psychology and Child Development, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, United States.
Mytien LeDepartment of Psychology and Child Development, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, United States.
Kunhua ChengDepartment of Psychology and Child Development, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, United States.
Christopher N WahlheimDepartment of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, United States.
James W AntonyDepartment of Psychology and Child Development, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past century of memory research, the interplay between initial and later-learned information in determining long-term memory retention has been of central interest. A likely factor for determining whether initial and later memories interfere with or strengthen each other is semantic relatedness. Relatedness has been shown to

Indexed as

LearningSemanticsAdolescentAdultCuesFemaleHumansMaleMemoryMemory, Long-TermYoung Adultepisodic memoryepisodic-semantic interactionshumanmemory interdependencememory interferenceneurosciencesemantic memory

Identifiers

PMID39656090
PMCPMC11630824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.