Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39656065›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2024

Exploring Extended Warheads toward Developing Cysteine-Targeted Covalent Kinase Inhibitors.

Zheng Zhao, Philip E Bourne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zheng ZhaoSchool of Data Science and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22904, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1453-3230
Philip E BourneSchool of Data Science and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22904, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7618-7292

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In designing covalent kinase inhibitors (CKIs), the inclusion of electrophiles as attacking warheads demands careful choreography, ensuring not only their presence on the scaffold moiety but also their precise interaction with nucleophiles in the binding sites. Given the limited number of known electrophiles, exploring adjacent chemical space to broaden the palette of available electrophiles capable of covalent inhibition is desirable. Here, we systematically analyze the characteristics of warheads and the corresponding adjacent fragments for use in CKI design. We first collect all the released cysteine-targeted CKIs from multiple databases and create one CKI data set containing 16,961 kinase-inhibitor data points from 12,381 unique CKIs covering 146 kinases with accessible cysteines in their binding pockets. Then, we analyze this data set, focusing on the extended warheads (i.e., warheads + adjacent fragments)─including 30 common warheads and 1344 unique adjacent fragments. In so doing, we provide structural insights and delineate chemical properties and patterns in these extended warheads. Notably, we highlight the popular patterns observed within reversible CKIs for the popular warheads cyanoacrylamide and aldehyde. This study provides medicinal chemists with novel insights into extended warheads and a comprehensive source of adjacent fragments, thus guiding the design, synthesis, and optimization of CKIs.

Indexed as

CysteineProtein Kinase InhibitorsBinding SitesDrug DesignHumansModels, MolecularProtein KinasesCysteineProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein Kinases

Identifiers

PMID39656065
PMCPMC11684028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.