Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39655849›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2025

A pain research strategy for Europe: A European survey and position paper of the European Pain Federation EFIC.

Gisèle Pickering, Mary O'Keeffe, Kirsty Bannister, Susanne Becker, Sonia Cottom, Felicia J Cox, Elon Eisenberg, David P Finn, Patrice Forget, Thomas Graven-Nielsen and 19 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pain (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. "It Is a Vicious Circle": Experiences of People Living With Obesity and Chronic Pain: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis (QES).Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Gisèle PickeringPlatform of Clinical Investigation, Inserm CIC 1405, University Hospital, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9054-9379
Mary O'KeeffeUCD School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7104-9248
Kirsty BannisterInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3043-3574
Susanne BeckerClinical Psychology, Department of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5681-4084
Sonia CottomPain Association Scotland, Perth, Scotland.
Felicia J CoxPain Management Service, Royal Brompton & Harefield hospitals, Part of Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3624-6593
Elon EisenbergRappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3748-1349
David P FinnPharmacology & Therapeutics, School of Medicine, Galway Neuroscience Centre and Centre for Pain Research, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6186-621X
Patrice ForgetInstitute of Applied Health Sciences, Aberdeen Centre for Musculoskeletal Health (Epidemiology Group), School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5772-8439
Thomas Graven-NielsenCenter for Neuroplasticity and Pain (CNAP), Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7787-4860
Eija KalsoDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4899-605X
Magdalena Kocot-KepskaDepartment of Pain Research and Treatment, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0392-2583
Hugo Leite-AlmeidaLife and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, Braga, Portugal.
Jose Antonio Lopez-GarciaDepartment of Systems Biology (Physiology), Universidad de Alcala, Alcala de Henares, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1725-6665
Mira MeeusPain in Motion International Research Consortium, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2022-5114
André MourauxInstitute of Neuroscience (IONS), UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1056-5980
Bruno PereiraClinical Research and Innovation Department, University Hospital Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Livia PuljakCentre for Evidence-Based Medicine and Health Care, Department of Nursing, School of Medicine, Catholic University of Croatia, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8467-6061
Michiel F RenemanDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4058-3437
Iben RohdePain Alliance Europe (PAE), Brussels, Belgium.
Ioannis SotiropoulosInstitute of Biosciences and Applications, National Centre for Scientific Research (NCSR) Demokritos, Agia Paraskevi, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0115-0038
Nathan SkidmoreSchool of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7477-6720
Thomas R TölleDepartment of Neurology, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4470-5531
Snezana Tomasevic TodorovicFaculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2908-3810
Andrea TruiniDepartment of Human Neuroscience, University Sapienza, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2630-7647
Kevin E VowlesSchool of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast & Belfast Centre for Pain Rehabilitation, Belfast Health and Social Care NHS Trust, Belfast, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4255-9067
Esther Pogatzki-ZahnDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0981-3940
Luis Garcia-LarreaLyon Neurosciences Center Research Unit, INSERM U1028, & Claude Bernard University, Lyon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9873-789X
Brona M FullenUCD School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4408-2063

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPain is the leading cause of disability and reduced quality of life worldwide. Despite the increasing burden for patients and healthcare systems, pain research remains underfunded and under focused. Having stakeholders identify and prioritize areas that need urgent attention in the field will help focus funding topics, reduce 'research waste', improve the effectiveness of pain research and therapy and promote the uptake of research evidence. In this study, the European Pain Federation (EFIC) developed a Pain Research Strategy for Europe.

methodsThe study used multiple methods, including literature searches, multidisciplinary expert debate, a survey and a final consensus meeting. The cross-sectional survey was conducted among 628 European pain researchers, clinicians, educators and industry professionals to obtain the rating and hierarchy of pain research priorities. The final consensus meeting involved a multidisciplinary expert panel including people with lived experience from 23 countries. The survey results guided discussions where top priorities were agreed.

resultsContent analysis identified nine survey themes, of which five emerged as top priorities: (i) understand the pathophysiology of pain; (ii) understand and address comorbidities; (iii) critically assess current therapies; (iv) develop new treatments; and (v) explore the biopsychosocial impacts of pain. Physical, psychological and social approaches were prioritized at the same level as pharmacological treatments. The top priorities were endorsed by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The panel emphasized the importance of also clearly communicating the concepts of prediction, prevention self-management and personalized pain management in the final strategy.

conclusionsThe content of the final top research priorities' list reflects a holistic approach to pain management. The equal importance given to physical, psychological and social aspects alongside pharmacological treatments highlights the importance of a comprehensive biopsychosocial-orientated research strategy. The expert panel's endorsement of five top priorities, coupled with an emphasis on communicating the concepts of prediction, prevention, self-management and personalized pain management, provides a clear direction for future basic, translational and clinical research. SIGNIFICANCE: EFIC has developed a Pain Research Strategy for Europe that identifies pain research areas deserving the most focus and financial support. Implementation and wide dissemination of this Strategy is vital to increase the conduct of urgent pain projects, pain research funding and the implementation of research findings into practice, to ultimately decrease the personal, societal and financial burden of pain.

Indexed as

PainPain ManagementBiomedical ResearchCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeHumansResearchSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID39655849
PMCPMC11629740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.