ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2024
Machine Learning-Based Prediction for In-Hospital Mortality After Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage Using Real-World Clinical and Image Data.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Poor Outcomes in Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Brain and behavior · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Transforming Intracerebral Hemorrhage Care with Artificial Intelligence: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Assessing performance, calibration, and explainability of machine learning versus traditional models for early outcome prediction after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.Systematic reviews · 2026Article
- Deep Learning for Dynamic Prognostic Prediction in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Model Development and Validation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Postoperative Rebleeding: The Sword of Damocles in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Intracerebral Hemorrhage.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Machine Learning-Based Models for Intracerebral Hemorrhage In-Hospital Mortality Prediction.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Machine learning integration of routine inflammatory biomarkers for predicting remote punctate ischemic lesions following intracerebral hemorrhage: a single-center retrospective study.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMachine learning (ML) techniques are widely employed across various domains to achieve accurate predictions. This study assessed the effectiveness of ML in predicting early mortality risk among patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in real-world settings. METHODS AND
resultsML-based models were developed to predict in-hospital mortality in 527 patients with ICH using raw brain imaging data from brain computed tomography and clinical data. The models' performances were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves and calibration plots, comparing them with traditional risk scores such as the ICH score and ICH grading scale. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to examine the post-ICH survival rates, stratified by ML-based risk assessment. The net benefit of ML-based models was evaluated using decision curve analysis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.91 (95% CI, 0.86-0.95) for the ICH score, 0.93 (95% CI, 0.89-0.97) for the ICH grading scale, 0.83 (95% CI, 0.71-0.91) for the ML-based model fitted with raw image data only, and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.76-0.93) for the ML-based model fitted using clinical data without specialist expertise. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve increased significantly to 0.97 (95% CI, 0.94-0.99) when the ML model was fitted using clinical and image data assessed by specialists. All ML-based models demonstrated good calibration, and the survival rates showed significant differences between risk groups. Decision curve analysis indicated the highest net benefit when utilizing the findings assessed by specialists.
conclusionsML-based prediction models exhibit satisfactory performance in predicting post-ICH in-hospital mortality when utilizing raw imaging data or nonspecialist input. Nevertheless, incorporating specialist expertise notably improves performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.