Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39655759›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2024

Machine Learning-Based Prediction for In-Hospital Mortality After Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage Using Real-World Clinical and Image Data.

Koutarou Matsumoto, Kazuaki Ishihara, Katsuhiko Matsuda, Koki Tokunaga, Shigeo Yamashiro, Hidehisa Soejima, Naoki Nakashima, Masahiro Kamouchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Koutarou MatsumotoDepartment of Health Care Administration and Management, Graduate School of Medical Sciences Kyushu University Fukuoka Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0769-7763
Kazuaki IshiharaBiostatistics Center Kurume University Kurume Japan.
Katsuhiko MatsudaDepartment of Radiology Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital Kumamoto Japan.
Koki TokunagaDepartment of Pharmacy Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital Kumamoto Japan.
Shigeo YamashiroDivision of Neurosurgery Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital Kumamoto Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4634-803X
Hidehisa SoejimaInstitute for Medical Information Research and Analysis Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital Kumamoto Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8550-7481
Naoki NakashimaMedical Information Center Kyushu University Hospital Fukuoka Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4926-8772
Masahiro KamouchiDepartment of Health Care Administration and Management, Graduate School of Medical Sciences Kyushu University Fukuoka Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5348-8762

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMachine learning (ML) techniques are widely employed across various domains to achieve accurate predictions. This study assessed the effectiveness of ML in predicting early mortality risk among patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in real-world settings. METHODS AND

resultsML-based models were developed to predict in-hospital mortality in 527 patients with ICH using raw brain imaging data from brain computed tomography and clinical data. The models' performances were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves and calibration plots, comparing them with traditional risk scores such as the ICH score and ICH grading scale. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to examine the post-ICH survival rates, stratified by ML-based risk assessment. The net benefit of ML-based models was evaluated using decision curve analysis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.91 (95% CI, 0.86-0.95) for the ICH score, 0.93 (95% CI, 0.89-0.97) for the ICH grading scale, 0.83 (95% CI, 0.71-0.91) for the ML-based model fitted with raw image data only, and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.76-0.93) for the ML-based model fitted using clinical data without specialist expertise. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve increased significantly to 0.97 (95% CI, 0.94-0.99) when the ML model was fitted using clinical and image data assessed by specialists. All ML-based models demonstrated good calibration, and the survival rates showed significant differences between risk groups. Decision curve analysis indicated the highest net benefit when utilizing the findings assessed by specialists.

conclusionsML-based prediction models exhibit satisfactory performance in predicting post-ICH in-hospital mortality when utilizing raw imaging data or nonspecialist input. Nevertheless, incorporating specialist expertise notably improves performance.

Indexed as

Cerebral HemorrhageHospital MortalityMachine LearningTomography, X-Ray ComputedAcute DiseaseAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk Factorsdeep learningintracerebral hemorrhagemachine learningprognostic score

Identifiers

PMID39655759
PMCPMC11935536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.