Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39655713›Full record

ReviewEndocrine-related cancer2025

Mechanisms of resistance to RET-directed therapies.

Roderick J Clifton-Bligh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Endocrine-related cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cancer biology & therapy · 2026
    Article
  2. RETurn of the Gene. Post scriptum.Endocrine-related cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Roderick J Clifton-BlighORCID 0000-0002-1545-0368

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The association between RET and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 was established in 1993 and remains one of the very few oncogenes for which distinct phenotypes (medullary thyroid cancer or pheochromocytoma) are associated with the same hot-spot variants occurring in either germline or somatic DNA. Somatic RET fusion events have also been described in several cancers, including papillary thyroid cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer, breast cancer, salivary gland cancer and pancreatic cancer. Highly selective RET inhibitors have improved outcomes in RET-altered cancers and have been well-tolerated. Nevertheless, primary and acquired drug resistance has been observed, arising from distinct genomic alterations either in RET (on-target resistance) or via alternate oncogenic pathways (bypass resistance). The same mechanisms of resistance have been observed across multiple cancer types, which implies RET-altered cancers evolve away from RET addiction via stochastic subclonal events. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for identifying therapeutic opportunities to overcome resistance. Successful treatment targeting bypass oncogenes has been reported in several instances, at least for short-term outcomes; in contrast, although several compounds have been reported to overcome on-target RET alterations, none have yet been translated into routine clinical practice and this remains an area of urgent clinical need.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, NeoplasmNeoplasmsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-retAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsHumansAntineoplastic AgentsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-retRET protein, humanmedullary thyroid cancerpralsetinibRETselpercatinib

Identifiers

PMID39655713
PMCPMC11798414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.