Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39655544›Full record

ArticleJournal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners2026

An assessment of seven closed system transfer devices in accordance with the 2015 NIOSH vapor containment performance protocol.

Lori T Armistead, Michael Stepanovic, Megan A Earnhart, Stephen F Eckel

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lori T ArmisteadDivision of Practice Advancement and Clinical Education, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4680-0156
Michael StepanovicDivision of Practice Advancement and Clinical Education, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Megan A EarnhartDivision of Practice Advancement and Clinical Education, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Stephen F EckelDivision of Practice Advancement and Clinical Education, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IntroductionThe purpose of this study was to assess and compare the effectiveness of seven different closed system transfer device (CSTD) product lines following the 2015 NIOSH Vapor Containment Performance Protocol, using a Gasmet™ DX5000 Terra multigas FTIR analyzer.MethodsSeven different CSTD systems were assessed using a two-task evaluation on their capacity to contain the NIOSH-specified challenge agent, 70% isopropyl alcohol (IPA). Task 1 simulated reconstitution and compounding steps while Task 2 simulated compounding and administration steps. Vial adapters, syringe adapters, IV bag adapters, and y-site adapters from each CSTD product line were tested. All tasks were performed in a custom-built environmental test chamber as outlined in the 2015 NIOSH protocol, with isopropyl alcohol (IPA) release detected and measured by a Gasmet™ analyzer.ResultsThe BD PhaSeal™ CSTD product line effectively contained IPA vapor during both tasks with a task performance metric of 0.00 ppm for each task. BD PhaSeal™ Optima, Equashield

Indexed as

2-PropanolDrug CompoundingNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S.Occupational ExposureHumansUnited States2-Propanolclosed system transfer devicesHazardous drugsnational institute for occupational safety and healthoccupational exposurepharmaceutical preparationssterile compounding

Identifiers

PMID39655544
PMCPMC13176493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.