ArticleJournal of CME2024
An Overview of Continuing Medical Education/Continuing Professional Development Systems in the Middle East and North Africa: A Mixed Methods Assessment.
Article in Journal of CME, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Disparities in gynecological care capacity in China: a national assessment using the structure-process-outcome framework.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Factors motivating attendance at continuing medical education programs: a mixed-methods study from a Middle Eastern Country.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Reforming Graduate Medical Education in Syria: A Strategic Framework for Post-Conflict Recovery.Avicenna journal of medicine · 2025Article
- Accredited Continuing Medical Education Delivers: Evidence of Value, Trust, and Impact Across the Healthcare System.Journal of CME · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aims of this assessment were to describe the requirements for physicians to engage in CME/CPD; explore perceptions of in-country SMEs of their CME/CPD systems; describe perceptions of in-country physicians about interprofessional continuing education (IPCE) and independent CME/CPD; and provide recommendations that may be adopted to improve quality and effectiveness. An assessment of CME/CPD systems in the Middle East and North Africa was conducted using a mixed-methods approach that included 1:1 interviews with in-country SMEs and an electronic survey capturing qualitative and quantitative data from practicing in-country physicians. The results of this assessment were strongly influenced by Egypt and Israel in the Middle East, and Algeria and Morocco in North Africa. The CME/CPD systems demonstrate wide variation from absent/immature systems to robust/mature systems. Strategies to improve the quality of the CME/CPD systems range from implementing basic standards in North Africa to evaluating the impact of CME/CPD in practice in the Middle East. The maturity of CME/CPD systems seems to affect physician awareness, independence from the influence of pharmaceutical companies over education, and IPCE, with more mature systems having a positive relationship to awareness, independence and engagement in IPCE. Maturity of CME/CPD systems is less tied to physician perceptions of value of CME/CPD, hours of participation, perceptions of what is missing from current systems, and preferred formats of education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.