Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39655334›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2024

The motivation to inform others: a field experiment with wild chimpanzees.

Derry Taylor, Sam Adue, Monday M'Botella, Denis Tatone, Marina Davila-Ross, Klaus Zuberbühler, Guillaume Dezecache

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Derry TaylorUniversity of Neuchatel, Neuchatel, Switzerland.
Sam AdueBudongo Conservation Field Station, Masindi, Uganda.
Monday M'BotellaBudongo Conservation Field Station, Masindi, Uganda.
Denis TatoneCentral European University, Budapest, Hungary.
Marina Davila-RossUniversity of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, United Kingdom.
Klaus ZuberbühlerUniversity of Neuchatel, Neuchatel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8378-088X
Guillaume DezecacheBudongo Conservation Field Station, Masindi, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-9366-6287

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Accumulating evidence indicates that some ape species produce more alarm behaviors to potential dangers when in the presence of uninformed conspecifics. However, since previous studies presented naturalistic stimuli, the influence of prior experience could not be controlled for. Method: To examine this, we investigated whether apes (wild chimpanzees of the Budongo Forest, Uganda) would communicate differently about a novel danger (an unusually large spider) depending on whether they were with an uniformed conspecific. We tested nine adult males, four of which were exposed to the danger twice alone (Non-Social group), while the remaining five were exposed to the danger first alone and then in the presence of conspecifics (Social group). Results: We found that both alarm calling and gaze marking (

Indexed as

MotivationPan troglodytesSocial BehaviorAnimal CommunicationAnimalsBehavior, AnimalMaleUgandaAlarm callChimpanzeeCommunicationGazing

Identifiers

PMID39655334
PMCPMC11627086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.