Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39655324›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2024

Association of vaccine intention against COVID-19 using the 5C Scale and its constructs: a Pima County, Arizona cross-sectional survey.

Maiya G Block Ngaybe, Namoonga Mantina, Benjamin Pope, Veena Raghuraman, Jacob Marczak, Sonja Velickovic, Dominique Jordan, Mary Kinkade, Carlos Mario Perez-Velez, Beatrice J Krauss and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Maiya G Block NgaybeMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Tucson, Arizona, United States.
Namoonga MantinaMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Tucson, Arizona, United States.
Benjamin PopeMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Tucson, Arizona, United States.
Veena RaghuramanMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Tucson, Arizona, United States.
Jacob MarczakMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Tucson, Arizona, United States.
Sonja VelickovicMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Tucson, Arizona, United States.
Dominique JordanMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Tucson, Arizona, United States.
Mary KinkadeDivision of Epidemiology, Pima County Health Department, Tucson, Arizona, United States.
Carlos Mario Perez-VelezDivision of Epidemiology, Pima County Health Department, Tucson, Arizona, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6067-0861
Beatrice J KraussPsychology Department, College of Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6411-802X
Shailesh M AdvaniDepartment of Internal Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, United States.
Melanie BellMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Tucson, Arizona, United States.
Purnima MadhivananMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Tucson, Arizona, United States.

Funding

Research Mentoring and Building Capacity of underrepresented Minority Research Scientists in India.D43TW010540 · FIC · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MICHELE BARRY, Eva Harris · 2017 to 2026
$15.5M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW010540
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Vaccine hesitancy has been ranked as one of the top 10 threats to global health by the World Health Organization. The 5C model (Confidence, Calculation of risk, Complacency, Collective Responsibility, and Constraints) and an accompanying tool to measure vaccine hesitancy, summarize several significant explanatory variables, and move beyond the most common explanatory variable, Confidence. Methods: From January to May 2021, we administered a cross-sectional survey among adults in Pima County, Arizona in collaboration with the local health department to assess psychological antecedents to ( Results: Of the 1,823 participants who responded to the survey, 924 (76%) were included in the final analyses. Respondents were White (71%), non-Hispanic (59%), Female (68%), Liberal (37%) and Married (46%). The average age of the participants was 43.9 (±1.3) years. Based on the 5C Scale, Confidence (adjOR:3.64, CI [3.08-4.29]), Collective Responsibility (adjOR:1.94, CI [1.57-2.39]) and Complacency (adjOR:0.64, CI [0.51-0.80]) were significantly associated with intention to vaccinate against COVID-19. Conclusion: Three of the five 5C variables were associated with the intention to vaccinate, two positively and one negatively. A limitation of the study was that the sample was not weighted to be representative of Pima County. Future research should focus on determining which interventions can bolster Confidence and Collective Responsibility attitudes in communities, while dampening Complacency, to better promote vaccine uptake.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesIntentionVaccination HesitancyAdultArizonaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesVaccinationYoung AdultCOVID-19 VaccinesAcceptabilityCOVID-19COVID-19 vaccineIntentionsPatient acceptance of health careVaccinationVaccination refusal

Identifiers

PMID39655324
PMCPMC11627084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.