Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39655314›Full record

ArticleNature and science of sleep2024

Waiting for in-Lab Polysomnography May Unnecessarily Prolong Treatment Start in Patients with Moderate or Severe OSA at Home Sleep Apnea Testing.

Johannes Pordzik, Christopher Seifen, Katharina Ludwig, Christian Ruckes, Tilman Huppertz, Christoph Matthias, Haralampos Gouveris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature and science of sleep, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Johannes PordzikDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery & Sleep Medicine Center, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, 55131, Germany.
Christopher SeifenDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery & Sleep Medicine Center, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, 55131, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2356-7494
Katharina LudwigDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery & Sleep Medicine Center, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, 55131, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6462-3763
Christian RuckesInterdisciplinary Center for Clinical Trials (IZKS), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, 55131, Germany.
Tilman HuppertzDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery & Sleep Medicine Center, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, 55131, Germany.
Christoph MatthiasDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery & Sleep Medicine Center, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, 55131, Germany.
Haralampos GouverisDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery & Sleep Medicine Center, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, 55131, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7299-7346

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The gold standard in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) diagnostics is nocturnal full-night polysomnography (PSG). Due to high costs and high time effort portable respiratory polygraphy (PG or home sleep apnea testing-HSAT) has been developed. In contrast to PG the PSG gains relevant further information concerning sleep stages, arousals and leg movements. However, the role of PG in the diagnostic of OSA remains largely undefined. The aim of this study was to investigate the difference of PG- and PSG- related metrics in OSA, to understand if there is a difference in PG and PSG-based treatment decision and show up the time between performed PG and PSG. Patients and Methods: 99 consecutive patients with existing outpatient performed PG and followed PSG in our tertiary care otorhinolaryngology department between February 2020 and December 2023 were retrospectively assessed. All patients were treatment-naive at the time of consultation. The time between performed outpatient PG and PSG was calculated. Furthermore, clinical baseline parameter and PG as well as PSG data were evaluated. All data were then blinded presented with relevant comorbid diseases to two experts in sleep medicine in our tertiary care centre to decide whether PAP therapy was indicated or not. Results: Mean AHI was significantly higher in PSG (32.32 ± 22.78/h) compared to PG (22.60 ± 15.12/h) (p<0.001). Mean duration between performed PG and PSG was 194.99 ± 131.96 days (range between 37 and 842 days). Only in two patients PAP-therapy was indicated with PG results but not with PSG results. Only in one case PAP-therapy was not indicated with PG results but with PSG results. Conclusion: These data suggest initiating OSA therapy based on PG results for patients with at least moderate OSA on PG, followed by a confirming PSG and a control PSG under treatment to avoid unnecessary prolongation of treatment start.

Indexed as

obstructive sleep apneaPAPpolysomnographyportable respiratory polygraphy

Identifiers

PMID39655314
PMCPMC11626954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.