Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39655300›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of critical care medicine2024

Perspectives on non-emergent neonatal intensive care unit to pediatric intensive care unit care transfers in the United States.

Phillip D Cohen, Renee D Boss, David C Stockwell, Meghan Bernier, Joseph M Collaco, Sapna R Kudchadkar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of critical care medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Phillip D CohenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States. pcohen14@jh.edu.
Renee D BossDepartment of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States.
David C StockwellDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States.
Meghan BernierDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States.
Joseph M CollacoDepartment of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States.
Sapna R KudchadkarDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a substantial population of long-stay patients who non-emergently transfer directly from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) without an interim discharge home. These infants are often medically complex and have higher mortality relative to NICU or PICU-only admissions. Given an absence of data surrounding practice patterns for non-emergent NICU to PICU transfers, we hypothesized that we would encounter a broad spectrum of current practices and a high proportion of dissatisfaction with current processes.

aimTo characterize non-emergent NICU to PICU transfer practices across the United States and query PICU providers' evaluations of their effectiveness.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was drafted, piloted, and sent to one physician representative from each of 115 PICUs across the United States based on membership in the PARK-PICU research consortium and membership in the Children's Hospital Association. The survey was administered

resultsOne PICU attending from each of 81 institutions in the United States completed the survey (overall 70% response rate). Over half (52%) indicated their hospital transfers patients without using set clinical criteria, and only 33% indicated that their hospital has a standardized protocol to facilitate non-emergent transfer. Fewer than half of respondents reported that their institution's non-emergent NICU to PICU transfer practices were effective for clinicians (47%) or patient families (38%). Respondents evaluated their centers' transfers as less effective when they lacked any transfer criteria (

conclusionMost hospitals lacked any clinical criteria or protocols for non-emergent NICU to PICU transfers. More positive perceptions of transfer effectiveness were found among those with set criteria and/or transfer protocols.

Indexed as

Care transitionChronic critical illnessIntensive care unitsNeonatal intensive carePediatric intensive careTransfer

Identifiers

PMID39655300
PMCPMC11577534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.