Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39655238›Full record

ReviewUrban ecosystems2025

Evidence-base for urban green-blue infrastructure to support insect diversity.

Diana E Bowler, Corey T Callaghan, Jéssica F Felappi, Brittany M Mason, Robin Hutchinson, Prashant Kumar, Laurence Jones

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Urban ecosystems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Diana E BowlerBiodiversity Monitoring & Analysis, UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, UK.
Corey T CallaghanDepartment of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Fort Lauderdale Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL USA.
Jéssica F FelappiCenter for Development Research, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Brittany M MasonDepartment of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Fort Lauderdale Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL USA.
Robin HutchinsonBiodiversity Monitoring & Analysis, UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, UK.
Prashant KumarDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Global Centre for Clean Air Research (GCARE), University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH UK.
Laurence JonesUK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Environment Centre Wales, Bangor, LL57 2UW UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Green-blue urban infrastructures potentially offer win-win benefits for people and nature in urban areas. Given increasing evidence of widespread declines of insects, as well as their ecological importance, there is a need to better understand the potential role of green-blue urban infrastructure for insect conservation. In this review, we evaluated 201 studies about the ability of green-blue infrastructure to support insect diversity. Most studies were focused on the role of local and landscape-level characteristics of green-blue infrastructure. Fewer studies explicitly compared one type of infrastructure to another, and even fewer compared insect communities between green-blue infrastructure and traditional infrastructure. Overall, the body of research highlights the importance of plant diversity and reduced intensity of management (e.g., mowing) for most insect taxon groups. While local characteristics seem to be generally more important than landscape factors, insect communities within green-blue infrastructures can also depend on their connectivity and landscape context. Some infrastructure types are generally more beneficial than others; for instance, ground-level habitats tend to support more insects than green roofs. Few studies simultaneously studied synergies or trade-offs with other services provided by green-blue infrastructure, but environmental variables, such as tree cover and plant diversity, that affect insects are likely to also affect the provision of other services such as improving thermal comfort and the well-being of people. Our review offers some initial evidence for how green-blue infrastructure could be designed for multifunctionality with insects in mind. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11252-024-01649-4.

Indexed as

Blue-green infrastructureGardensInvertebratesNature-based solutionsParksUrban biodiversityUrban green spaceUrbanisationUrban planning

Identifiers

PMID39655238
PMCPMC11625076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.