ArticleFrontiers in genetics2024
Diagnostic value of 5 miRNAs combined detection for breast cancer.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Extracellular vesicle-associated and non-vesicle-associated microRNAs for early breast cancer detection: a systematic review.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Evaluation of serum microRNA-9-5p expression and its predicted target genes as potential biomarkers for breast cancer.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Article
- Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells derived exosomes enhance the therapeutic efficacy of anti-miR-10b in glioblastoma.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Integrating circulating microRNAs with epidemiological factors enhances breast cancer detection across subtypes: the MCC-Spain study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Analysis of Factors Related to Lymph Node Metastasis Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: Correlation Between Plasma Exosomal Circular RNA and Metastasis.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2026Article
- Phosphorylated NCOA6 promotes aggressiveness and contributes patient outcomes in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.Cancer cell international · 2025Article
- Prognostic potential of N6-methyladenosine methylation-associated genes in lung adenocarcinoma.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- A lactylation-related gene signature predicts metastasis and prognosis in breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Expression of ITGA3 in pan-cancer tissues and its relationship to prognosis and immune infiltration.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Comprehensive analysis of ALYREF gene expression and its correlation with immunotherapy efficacy and circulating tumor cells in bladder cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Implication of an exosome-based gene signature for estimating clinical outcomes of triple-negative breast cancer and assisting in individualized therapy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The expression of miR-381-3p in acute myeloid leukemia and its effect on corresponding cell proliferation and apoptosis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Database analysis reveals endophilin A expression as a marker of metastasis and prognosis in breast cancer.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Multi-omics analysis reveals the prognostic value and immunomodulatory role of CTSW in breast cancer.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Novel radiation-derived gene blueprint stratifying patients with breast cancer.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Exploring the use of large language models for classification, clinical interpretation, and treatment recommendation in breast tumor patient records.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Pan-cancer analysis of PTPN6: prognostic significance and functional implications in tumor progression.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- The assessment of breast cancer biomarkers in diagnosis, prognosis and treatment monitoring: integrated analysis.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer (BC) is the prevailing malignant tumor, with its prevalence and death rate steadily rising over time. BC often does not show obvious symptoms in its early stages and is difficult to distinguish from benign breast disease. We aimed to find a distinct group of miRNAs utilizing serum as a non-invasive biomarker for early BC diagnosis. Methods: Herein, we mainly include the screening stage, testing stage, and verification stage. In the screening stage, 8 miRNAs associated with BC were selected and analyzed via literature reading, and the expression of the above miRNAs in BC was further verified by bioinformatics and included in the research analysis. In the testing phase, quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was deployed to select the five miRNAs with the most significant expression differences in 15 BC patients and 15 benign breast controls to proceed to the next stage. In a subsequent validation phase, the five miRNAs obtained from serum samples from an additional 75 BC patients and 50 benign control patients were evaluated using RT-qPCR. The diagnostic capacity, specificity, and sensitivity of candidate miRNAs were estimated with the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC). Finally, the optimal diagnostic combination model with high sensitivity and strong specificity was constructed by using the above 5 miRNAs. Results: The BC patients reported a significant decline in mir-10b-5p, mir-133a-3p, mir-195-5p, and mir-155-3p levels in serum levels contrasted with those in benign controls. Additionally, BC patients experienced elevated mir-195-3p levels than in benign controls. We implemented ROC analysis to evaluate its diagnostic capacity for BC. We demonstrated that all five miRNAs had robust diagnostic capability, with an AUC above 0.8. We developed a conclusive diagnostic combination model consisting of these 5 miRNAs in order to enhance the diagnosis accuracy. This model demonstrated a high diagnostic value, as shown by an AUC of 0.948. Conclusion: The serum biomarker panels composed of five miRNAs identified in this study (mir-10b-5p, mir-133a-3p, mir-195-5p, mir-195-3p, and mir-155-3p) provide hope for early, non-invasive, and accurate diagnosis of BC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.