Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39655206›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2024

Delusion-proneness predicts COVID-19 vaccination behavior.

Kasim Acar, Ariadni Karagiannidou, Andreas Olsson, Jan-Willem van Prooijen, Leonie J T Balter, John Axelsson, Martin Ingvar, Alexander V Lebedev, Predrag Petrovic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kasim AcarCentre for Psychiatry Research (CPF), Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ariadni KaragiannidouCentre for Psychiatry Research (CPF), Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Andreas OlssonCenter for Cognitive and Computational Neuroscience (CCNP), Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jan-Willem van ProoijenDepartment of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Leonie J T BalterDivision of Psychology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
John AxelssonCenter for Cognitive and Computational Neuroscience (CCNP), Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Martin IngvarDivison of Neuro, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Alexander V Lebedev *Centre for Psychiatry Research (CPF), Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Predrag Petrovic *Centre for Psychiatry Research (CPF), Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Vaccination-related conspiracy ideation is related to reduced compliance with public health advice globally. Such beliefs have previously been linked to the delusion-proneness trait. However, it is not known how this extends to getting vaccinated. Methods: Here, we examined how delusion-proneness, as assessed by Peters et al. Delusions Inventory (PDI), is associated with COVID-19 vaccination in a sample of 273 subjects. We also examined whether delusion-proneness predicted the time to get vaccinated, after the vaccine became available. Results: Unvaccinated subjects were more delusion-prone than vaccinated subjects (W=2225.5, Discussion: Our results suggest that delusion-proneness is a key factor for attaining conspiracy beliefs, at least in relation to COVID-19 pandemic, and associated with lower vaccination rates as well as longer time to get vaccinated.

Indexed as

conspiracy ideationCOVID-19delusion pronenesspsychosisschizophreniavaccination

Identifiers

PMID39655206
PMCPMC11625794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.