ArticleERJ open research2024
Automated method of bronchus and artery dimension measurement in an adult bronchiectasis population.
Article in ERJ open research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chest CT imaging toward personalized management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, and bronchiectasis: pulmonologist perspectives.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Review
- A novel quantitative method for CT assessment of bronchiectasis using AI-based airway segmentation and upper limits of normal airway caliber.Respiratory research · 2026Article
- Quantitative Analysis of Bronchiectasis in Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency.Canadian respiratory journal · 2026Article
- Narrative review: mucus plugging in chronic obstructive lung diseases and bronchiectasis.European clinical respiratory journal · 2026Review
- The impact of dornase alfa on imaging features of bronchiectasis.Research square · 2025Article
- Automated computed tomographic analysis of bronchial thickness and mucus plugs in bronchiectasis with asthma.ERJ open research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Bronchiectasis (BE) is a disease defined by irreversible dilatation of the airway. Computed tomography (CT) plays an important role in the detection and quantification of BE. The aim of this study was three-fold: 1) to assess bronchus-artery (BA) dimensions using fully automated software in a cohort of BE disease patients; 2) to compare BA dimensions with semi-quantitative BEST-CT (Bronchiectasis Scoring Technique for CT) scores for BE and bronchial wall thickening; and 3) to explore the structure-function relationship between BA-method lumen dimensions and spirometry outcomes. Methods: Baseline CTs of BE patients who participated in a clinical trial were collected retrospectively. CTs were analysed manually with the BEST-CT scoring system and automatically using LungQ (v.2.1.0.1, Thirona, The Netherlands), which measures the following BA dimensions: diameters of bronchial outer wall (B Results: In total, 65 patients and 16 900 BA pairs were analysed by the automated BA method. The median (range) percentage of BA pairs defined as widened was 69 (55-84)% per CT using a cut-off value of 1.5 for B Conclusion: The automated BA method, which is an accurate and sensitive tool, demonstrates a stronger correlation between visual and automated assessment and lung function when using a higher cut-off value to define bronchiectasis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.