ArticleERJ open research2024
The prevalence and implications of depression and anxiety in patients with bronchiectasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in ERJ open research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Coexistence of COPD or asthma in patients with bronchiectasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Depression and anxiety in interstitial lung disease: a systematic review, meta-analysis and Mendelian randomization.Translational psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Treatable traits in paediatric bronchiectasis: current practice and a proposed checklist.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- The importance of symptoms in bronchiectasis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026Review
- Nonpharmacologic Care of Bronchiectasis: Addressing Frailty with Nutrition and Physical Activity.Pulmonary therapy · 2026Review
- Nonpharmacological interventions for managing infections in chronic respiratory diseases: a comprehensive overview.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Comorbidities significantly affect bronchiectasis prognosis. Depression and anxiety are frequently encountered psychological comorbidities that have the greatest impact on bronchiectasis. This systematic review aimed to identify the prevalence of depression and anxiety and describe their implications for bronchiectasis. Methods: Three databases were searched from their inception to October 2023 for studies reporting the prevalence and/or clinical implications of depression and anxiety in patients with bronchiectasis. Two independent reviewers rated the quality of the evidence presented in the studies using the risk of bias tool for prevalence studies. Results: Of the 50 studies identified, 17 studies with 2637 patients were included. The overall risk of bias was classified as low (10 studies) or moderate (seven studies). The pooled prevalence of depression and anxiety was 31% (95% CI 24-38%) and 34% (95% CI 28-40%), respectively. Depression was significantly higher in female compared to male patients (risk difference 10%, 95% CI 0-21%) and associated with bronchiectasis exacerbation (adjusted odds ratio 1.72, 95% CI 1.28-2.15). Depression and anxiety are closely associated with poor health-related quality of life. However, clinical outcomes including dyspnoea symptoms, severity index, computed tomography score, lung function and physical activity were not associated with depression or anxiety. Conclusion: This study revealed a high prevalence of depression and anxiety among patients with bronchiectasis. Depression was more prevalent in females and is significantly associated with bronchiectasis exacerbation. Depression and anxiety were associated with poor health-related quality of life.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.