Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39655140›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Protocol for Comparing Benzodiazepine-Ketamine and Benzodiazepine-Fentanyl Sedation in Phacoemulsification (BEKEF): A Double-Blind Crossover Non-Inferiority Clinical Trial Study.

Rodrigo A Torres, Adriano C Faneli, Ricardo D C Oliveira, Pablo Amado, Eduardo F Marback, Juliana F Marback, Larrie R Laporte, Cristina Muccioli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rodrigo A TorresOphthalmology, HOBrasil Salvador, Salvador, BRA.
Adriano C FaneliMedicine, Bahiana School of Medicine and Public Health, Salvador, BRA.
Ricardo D C OliveiraOphthalmology, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, BRA.
Pablo AmadoAnesthesiology, HOBrasil Salvador, Salvador, BRA.
Eduardo F MarbackOphthalmology, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, BRA.
Juliana F MarbackMedicine, Bahiana School of Medicine and Public Health, Salvador, BRA.
Larrie R LaporteMedicine, Bahiana School of Medicine and Public Health, Salvador, BRA.
Cristina MuccioliOphthalmology, Federal University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, BRA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCataract surgery, particularly phacoemulsification, often requires sedation alongside topical anesthesia to manage patient anxiety and discomfort. This protocol proposes a study comparing the efficacy of ketamine and fentanyl, both combined with benzodiazepine, as sedation options for patients undergoing bilateral phacoemulsification.

methodsIn a randomized, double-blind, crossover clinical trial, at least 48 patients scheduled for bilateral cataract surgery will receive fentanyl with midazolam for one eye and ketamine with midazolam for the other. Sedation levels will be assessed using the Ramsay Sedation Scale, and the SURG-TLX Scale will measure intraoperative difficulties. Secondary outcomes include anesthesia-related complications, pain scores, and patient satisfaction.

resultsThe primary outcomes, utilizing the Ramsay Sedation Scale, will determine if ketamine combined with a benzodiazepine is non-inferior to fentanyl combined with a benzodiazepine for sedation during phacoemulsification. Secondary outcomes will provide insight into complications, patient and surgeon comfort, and overall satisfaction.

conclusionThis trial will evaluate whether ketamine offers a safe and effective alternative to fentanyl for sedation in cataract surgery, potentially optimizing sedation protocols to enhance patient and surgeon experiences.

Indexed as

cataract surgeryfentanylketaminephacoemulsificationsedation

Identifiers

PMID39655140
PMCPMC11626986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.