ArticleCureus2024
An Editorial on Revolutionizing Urinary Care in Pakistan by Embracing the United Kingdom National Health Service Approach to Catheterisation Documentation and Trial Without Catheter.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This editorial highlights the importance of catheterisation documentation and the practice of trials without catheters in improving patient outcomes in Pakistan. Acute urinary retention, a major urological emergency, needs short-term catheter placement, with a trial without a catheter used globally to reduce catheter-associated urinary tract infections. This procedure, often enhanced by alpha-1 blockers, enables patients to regain continence and promotes micturition post-catheterisation, particularly useful following surgeries such as prostatectomy. However, trials without catheters remain underutilised in Pakistan, particularly outside urology departments, potentially leading to severe complications such as acute renal failure and urosepsis. Accurate documentation of catheterisation details, including catheter size, insertion time, clinical indications, and any complications, is paramount for minimising risks and improving continuity of care. A clinical audit led by Dr. Syed Haseeb Ullah Jan Bacha at Eastbourne District General Hospital highlighted critical gaps in catheterisation documentation, revealing lapses in recording crucial parameters like bladder scan volumes and staff names. Recommendations from the audit, including educational interventions and system improvements, necessitate the need for precise record-keeping, a practice standard in the United Kingdom but lacking in Pakistan. Introducing trial without catheter (TWOC) and documentation practices can elevate patient safety and foster a culture of continuous improvement in Pakistan's healthcare system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.