Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39655120›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

The Investigation and Management of Peri-Prosthetic Joint Infection After Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Update Based on the Latest British Orthopaedic Association Standard and Speciality Standard Guidelines.

Sizar Doski, Alexandra Sebastiao, Prashant Thayaparan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sizar DoskiEmergency Medicine, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, GBR.
Alexandra SebastiaoTrauma and Orthopaedics, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, GBR.
Prashant ThayaparanTrauma and Orthopaedics, Whittington Health NHS Trust, London, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a significant complication following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Early identification and management are essential to prevent severe morbidity and mortality in these patients. Long-term complications of PJI include the need for multiple operations, disability, joint stiffness, reduced range of motion, and increased mortality. Clinical signs, inflammatory markers, imaging, tissue sampling, and synovial fluid analysis are required to diagnose PJI. Debridement antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) is an effective management option, but single- or two-stage exchange arthroplasty may be ultimately required. All cases of PJI in TKA must be discussed in a multi-disciplinary (MDT) meeting. This review incorporates the updated British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) standard and speciality standard to provide an up-to-date guideline on the early identification and management of PJI. We highlight that adhering to the BOA guidelines and adopting an MDT approach are essential for optimal patient outcomes.

Indexed as

british orthopaedic associationbritish orthopaedic association standardsperi-prosthetic joint infectionprimary knee replacementtka (total knee arthoplasty)total knee replacement complications

Identifiers

PMID39655120
PMCPMC11626415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.