ArticleCureus2024
Exploring Early Complications in Paraumbilical Hernia Mesh Repair: A Rigorous Six-Month Prospective Study and In-Depth Analysis.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction When an organ, such as the colon, pushes through the wall of the abdominal cavity, a hernia results. After femoral and inguinal hernias, umbilical hernias account for the third most common kind of abdominal hernia in adults precipitated by conditions such as obesity, ascites, and repeated pregnancies. A subtype of umbilical hernias called paraumbilical hernias is more likely to cause problems such as rupture, skin ulceration, and obstruction. Seroma, hematoma, and infection are the reported post-repair consequences but data regarding early complications is limited. High-quality data assessing early complications is necessary to improve mesh repair outcomes. Materials and methods This cross-sectional study was carried out in the Department of General Surgery at Medical Teaching Institute (MTI) Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar over one year, from January to December 2022. A total of 167 patients were selected using simple random sequential selection. Patients aged 20-60 years of both genders who were diagnosed with paraumbilical hernia in the emergency department were included. To prevent bias, those with uncontrolled diabetes or existing complications from hernia were excluded. Following informed consent, data were gathered using pre-designed proformas. Patients underwent open mesh repair during each surgery, and they were monitored at one and three months following the procedure. Complications such as seroma, hematoma, and wound infection were documented. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) with chi-square tests for categorical variables and a significance level of p < 0.05. Results The study included a total of 167 patients, with a mean age of 42 years (SD ±8.77). The majority of patients (40%) ranged in age from 41 to 50 years old, with 33% aged 31 to 40. Gender distribution revealed that 63 (38%) of the patients were male and 104 (62%) were female. Early complications included 25 (15%) wound infections, 32 (19%) seromas, and 63 (38%) hematomas. The occurrence of wound infections, seromas, and hematomas did not differ significantly by age or gender (p > 0.05). Conclusion Early complications from paraumbilical hernia mesh repair include wound infections (15%), seromas (19%), and hematomas (38%). Postoperative monitoring is critical to reducing these complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.