ArticleInterventional pain medicine2024
Prospective cohort study of basivertebral nerve ablation for chronic low back pain in a real-world setting: 12 months follow-up.
Article in Interventional pain medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05692440 (Prospective, Single-Arm, Cohort Study on Basivertebral Nerve Ablation With the Intracept Procedure), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prospective, Single-Arm, Cohort Study on Basivertebral Nerve Ablation With the Intracept Procedure
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adverse events associated with basivertebral nerve radiofrequency ablation: A comprehensive analysis from the MAUDE database.Interventional pain medicine · 2026Article
- Sustained pain relief across modic subtypes following basivertebral nerve ablation: A real-world study.Interventional pain medicine · 2026Article
- The effectiveness of basivertebral nerve radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of vertebrogenic low back pain: 1-year results of a prospective real-world cohort study.Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) · 2026Article
- Synergistic Effects of Basivertebral Nerve Ablation Plus Schroth Therapy for Adult Scoliosis: A Multicenter Propensity-Matched Cohort Study.Pain and therapy · 2025Article
- Rates of lumbar vertebral body compression fracture after basivertebral nerve ablation: A retrospective study utilizing a large national database.Interventional pain medicine · 2025Article
- Evaluating the effectiveness of 7-min basivertebral nerve ablation in treating vertebrogenic low back pain.Interventional pain medicine · 2025Article
- Safety and effectiveness of basivertebral nerve ablation in patients with osteoporosis and osteopenia: A real-world study.Interventional pain medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The basivertebral nerve, which densely supplies the vertebral endplates, is a potential source of chronic low back pain transmission in patients with Modic changes. Basivertebral nerve ablation (BVNA), a minimally invasive procedure, aims to disrupt this pain signaling. Objectives: In this study, we investigated BVNA's effectiveness in treatment of vertebrogenic low back pain and we followed patients for 12 months to assess long-term effectiveness. Study design: Single group prospective cohort study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05692440). Setting: Single-center, community private practice. Methods: Thirty-five patients were treated with the INTRACEPT® device (Boston Scientific, MA, USA). Thirty-one patients completed Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS), and SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) at baseline and follow-up visits up to 12 months. Results: The average age of the 31 patients was 73.0 ± 6.34 years and 71.0 % of the population was male (N=22)) at baseline. All four self-reported outcomes (ODI, VAS, SF-36 PCS, and MCS) showed statistically and clinically significant improvements from baseline through 12 months (all p < 0.001, with the exception of the SF-36 MCS at 1 month, p = 0.165). Overall, 67.7 % of patients demonstrated ODI improvements above the minimal clinically important difference (decrease of at least 15 points) and 77.4 % of patients demonstrated a decrease on the VAS above the minimal clinically important difference (≥2 cm reduction) at 12 months. Limitations: Limitations of the study include the lack of a control group and potentially unintentional bias in patient selection. Conclusions: BVNA demonstrates potential as an effective and minimally invasive treatment for chronic low back pain in a real-world patient cohort where substantial improvements were observed. These results align with those seen in previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and industry-funded studies of BVNA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.