Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39655088›Full record

ArticleInterventional pain medicine2024

Prospective cohort study of basivertebral nerve ablation for chronic low back pain in a real-world setting: 12 months follow-up.

William Schnapp, Moacir Schnapp, Jonathan Gottlieb, Lucien C Alexandre, Kenneth Martiatu, Gaëtan J-R Delcroix

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional pain medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05692440 (Prospective, Single-Arm, Cohort Study on Basivertebral Nerve Ablation With the Intracept Procedure), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05692440 phase4unknown statusnot on this map

Prospective, Single-Arm, Cohort Study on Basivertebral Nerve Ablation With the Intracept Procedure

TypeinterventionalSponsorNeuro Spine and Pain Center of Key WestRan2021 to 2026Enrolled70ConditionsLow Back PainArmsIntracept Procedure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

William SchnappNeuroSpine & Pain Center, Key West, FL, USA.
Moacir SchnappNeuroSpine & Pain Center, Key West, FL, USA.
Jonathan GottliebNeuroSpine & Pain Center, Key West, FL, USA.
Lucien C AlexandreNeuroSpine & Pain Center, Key West, FL, USA.
Kenneth MartiatuNeuroSpine & Pain Center, Key West, FL, USA.
Gaëtan J-R DelcroixNova Southeastern University, College of Allopathic Medicine, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The basivertebral nerve, which densely supplies the vertebral endplates, is a potential source of chronic low back pain transmission in patients with Modic changes. Basivertebral nerve ablation (BVNA), a minimally invasive procedure, aims to disrupt this pain signaling. Objectives: In this study, we investigated BVNA's effectiveness in treatment of vertebrogenic low back pain and we followed patients for 12 months to assess long-term effectiveness. Study design: Single group prospective cohort study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05692440). Setting: Single-center, community private practice. Methods: Thirty-five patients were treated with the INTRACEPT® device (Boston Scientific, MA, USA). Thirty-one patients completed Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS), and SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) at baseline and follow-up visits up to 12 months. Results: The average age of the 31 patients was 73.0 ± 6.34 years and 71.0 % of the population was male (N=22)) at baseline. All four self-reported outcomes (ODI, VAS, SF-36 PCS, and MCS) showed statistically and clinically significant improvements from baseline through 12 months (all p < 0.001, with the exception of the SF-36 MCS at 1 month, p = 0.165). Overall, 67.7 % of patients demonstrated ODI improvements above the minimal clinically important difference (decrease of at least 15 points) and 77.4 % of patients demonstrated a decrease on the VAS above the minimal clinically important difference (≥2 cm reduction) at 12 months. Limitations: Limitations of the study include the lack of a control group and potentially unintentional bias in patient selection. Conclusions: BVNA demonstrates potential as an effective and minimally invasive treatment for chronic low back pain in a real-world patient cohort where substantial improvements were observed. These results align with those seen in previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and industry-funded studies of BVNA.

Indexed as

Basivertebral nerve ablationChronic low back painCommunity settingEndplate degenerationIndependent studyModic changesRadiofrequency

Identifiers

PMID39655088
PMCPMC11626723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.