ArticleOpen access emergency medicine : OAEM2024
A Retrospective Study of Patiromer as Adjunct to Insulin Therapy for Acute Hyperkalemia in the Emergency Department.
Article in Open access emergency medicine : OAEM, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Net clinical benefit of patiromer for acute hyperkalemia: a post-hoc analysis of the reduce trial.Annals of medicine · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the clinical utility of administering patiromer as an adjunct to insulin for potassium reduction in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with hyperkalemia. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used electronic health record data to identify adults treated with at least one intravenous dose of regular insulin for hyperkalemia within the ED. Patients who were administered patiromer within one hour before or after their insulin dose were categorized as the intervention group. Matching was performed at a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome, mean change in potassium from baseline to the latest value within the 4-12 hour interval, was compared. Secondary outcomes included net clinical benefit, defined as the mean difference in the number of potassium-lowering interventions minus the change in potassium. Results: The final analysis included 133 patients treated with patiromer plus insulin and 133 patients treated with insulin alone. Participants had a mean age of 71 years; 43% were female, 31% self-identified as Black, and 38% self-identified as Latinx. No significant changes were observed in potassium from baseline (mean levels 6.2 mEq/L in each group) to the 4-12 hour time frame (patiromer: -0.90 mEq/L, n=78 vs insulin-only: -0.98 mEq/L, n=81; p = 0.51). The calculated net clinical benefit of potassium reduction was -0.25 in favor of the patiromer plus insulin group; however, this difference did not reach statistical significance. In the subgroup of eGFR >30 mL/min, patiromer group received numerically less potassium-lowering interventions (0.63 vs 1.12, p = 0.057). Conclusion: In this study of patients with acute hyperkalemia in the ED setting, concurrent administration of patiromer did not result in more sustained potassium reduction compared to insulin alone in the overall cohort. The trend in favor of adjunct patiromer in the subgroup with adequate renal function warrants further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.