ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Can preoperative percutaneous injection of ultrasound contrast agent locate sentinel lymph nodes of breast cancer?
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exempting axillary staging surgery in breast cancer using multimodal ultrasound imaging and radiomics of sentinel lymph nodes.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Diagnostic value of different contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) methods for sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients with breast neoplasms: a meta-analysis and indirect comparison.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: We evaluated the ability and accuracy of preoperative identification and localization of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) using intradermal injection of ultrasound contrast agent. Materials and methods: Prospectively recruited 191 early breast cancer patients with clinically negative axillary lymph nodes (ALNs). All participants received intradermal injection of microbubble contrast agent. Following the identification and localization of SLNs using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), Markers were deployed in the SLNs US-guided. Subsequently, the SLNs with Markers were stained and marked with a suspension of nano-carbon US-guided to assist in intraoperative localization of SLNs. Standard SLNB with methylene blue tracing was performed intraoperatively to assess the consistency between the two methods of SLNs localization, thereby determining the ability and accuracy of CEUS in identifying and localizing SLNs. Results: A total of 179 patients were included in the final evaluation analysis, in which a microbubble contrast agent was injected subcutaneously in the areolar region. A total of 201 SLNs were identified, with a median of 1 SLN per patient. Each SLN was identified in 157 patients, and two SLNs were identified in 22 patients. Among the 201 SLNs from the 179 patients, the proportion that could be individually matched between CEUS and the blue dye method was 95.5% (192/201), and the consistency evaluation in SLNs identification between CEUS and blue dye staining was excellent (Kappa value = 0.62, P < 0.001). Conclusion: The consistency of identification and localization of SLNs in early breast cancer patients between CEUS and the blue dye method was strong.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.