Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39655071›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2024

Potential predictive biomarkers in antitumor immunotherapy: navigating the future of antitumor treatment and immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy.

Xiangyu Yin, Yunjie Song, Wanglong Deng, Neil Blake, Xinghong Luo, Jia Meng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Revisiting tumor immunogenicity through the lens of mutant p53: Implications for cancer immunotherapy.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Programmed Cell Death Protein 1-Interleukin-2 Bispecific Agents for Cancer Therapy.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Tumor cell intrinsic mechanisms of immune escape.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xiangyu YinDepartment of Biological Sciences, School of Science, AI University Research Centre, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, China.
Yunjie SongJiangsu Simcere Diagnostics Co., Ltd., The State Key Laboratory of Neurology and Oncology Drug Development, Nanjing, China.
Wanglong DengJiangsu Simcere Diagnostics Co., Ltd., The State Key Laboratory of Neurology and Oncology Drug Development, Nanjing, China.
Neil BlakeInstitute of Infection, Veterinary & Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Xinghong LuoJiangsu Simcere Diagnostics Co., Ltd., The State Key Laboratory of Neurology and Oncology Drug Development, Nanjing, China.
Jia MengDepartment of Biological Sciences, School of Science, AI University Research Centre, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment modality, offering promising outcomes for various malignancies. However, the efficacy of ICIs varies among patients, highlighting the essential need of accurate predictive biomarkers. This review synthesizes the current understanding of biomarkers for ICI therapy, and discusses the clinical utility and limitations of these biomarkers in predicting treatment outcomes. It discusses three US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved biomarkers, programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and microsatellite instability (MSI), and explores other potential biomarkers, including tumor immune microenvironment (TIME)-related signatures, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) diversity, non-invasive biomarkers such as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), and combination biomarker strategies. The review also addresses multivariable predictive models integrating multiple features of patients, tumors, and TIME, which could be a promising approach to enhance predictive accuracy. The existing challenges are also pointed out, such as the tumor heterogeneity, the inconstant nature of TIME, nonuniformed thresholds and standardization approaches. The review concludes by emphasizing the importance of biomarker research in realizing the potential of personalized immunotherapy, with the goal of improving patient selection, treatment strategies, and overall outcomes in cancer treatment.

Indexed as

emerging biomarkersimmune checkpoint inhibitorsimmunotherapyMSIPD-L1TMB

Identifiers

PMID39655071
PMCPMC11625675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.