Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39655038›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2024

Accelerating evidence generation: Addressing critical challenges and charting a path forward.

Jeeyon G Rim, Jennifer G Jackman, Christoph P Hornik, Joni L Rutter, Haider Warraich, Janet Wittes, Lee Fleisher, Brian S Anderson, Ester Krofah, Elizabeth Kinter and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Jeeyon G RimDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0416-2480
Jennifer G JackmanDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Christoph P HornikDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Joni L RutterNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Haider WarraichBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Janet WittesWittes LLC, Washington, DC, USA.
Lee FleisherDuke-Margolis Institute for Health Policy, Washington, DC, USA.
Brian S AndersonMITRE, Bedford, MA, USA.
Ester KrofahMilken Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
Elizabeth KinterVir Biotechnology, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Trevan LockeDuke-Margolis Institute for Health Policy, Washington, DC, USA.
Lindsay KehoeDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5434-443X
Ali AbbasiFood and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Hilary MarstonFood and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Ann Meeker-O'ConnellFood and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Wendy WeberDivision of Extramural Research, NCCIH/NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Tracy WangPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), Washington, DC, USA.
Adrian F HernandezDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3387-9616
Martin LandrayUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Scott M PalmerDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficient evidence generation to assess the clinical and economic impact of medical therapies is critical amid rising healthcare costs and aging populations. However, drug development and clinical trials remain far too expensive and inefficient for all stakeholders. On October 25-26, 2023, the Duke Clinical Research Institute brought together leaders from academia, industry, government agencies, patient advocacy, and nonprofit organizations to explore how different entities and influencers in drug development and healthcare can realign incentive structures to efficiently accelerate evidence generation that addresses the highest public health needs. Prominent themes surfaced, including competing research priorities and incentives, inadequate representation of patient population in clinical trials, opportunities to better leverage existing technology and infrastructure in trial design, and a need for heightened transparency and accountability in research practices. The group determined that together these elements contribute to an inefficient and costly clinical research enterprise, amplifying disparities in population health and sustaining gaps in evidence that impede advancements in equitable healthcare delivery and outcomes. The goal of addressing the identified challenges is to ultimately make clinical trials faster, more inclusive, and more efficient across diverse communities and settings.

Indexed as

clinical trialsdrug developmentHealthcare deliverypatient advocacypopulation healthpublic health

Identifiers

PMID39655038
PMCPMC11626582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.