ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2024
Team science competencies across the career life course for translational science teams.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Organizational change readiness for team science: a pathway framework for team science success.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
- Embracing complexity: An opportunity for developmental evaluation.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Building capacity for translational team science: digital badging as a pathway to professionalization.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Thinking transdisciplinarily: Question-Collaboration Workshop to ideate across disciplines.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Interpretive ethnographic studies and in-depth qualitative research should be treated as high-quality evidence in the science of team science.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Embracing nonlinearity: A nuanced perspective on team science competency development.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Beyond deadlines and deliverables: Identifying barriers and facilitators to enhance the PROMICE of translational teams.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Implementing TeamMAPPS: Formative qualitative findings from the dissemination and implementation study of a new evidence-based team science intervention.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Team science competencies for clinical research professionals: A multileveled Delphi approach.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- The intersection of community engagement and team science research: A scoping review.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Translational science (TS) teams develop and conduct translational research. Academic TS teams can be categorized under three constituency groups: trainees and faculty, clinical research professionals (CRP), and community partners. Our study objectives were to define individual and team competencies of these three constituency groups during their career life course and determine relative importance and the level of mastery of each of the competencies needed at different stages of their life course. Methods: Each group was composed of experts for their constituency group. We applied individual and team competencies in TS teams by Lotrecchiano Results: The degree of relevance and level of mastery for individual and team competencies varies for trainees and faculty members across the career life course based on opportunities provided and relative importance at that career stage. However, CRPs enter TS teams at various career stages with fundamental, skilled, or advanced levels of smart skills that may or may not be contextual to their role. Community partners equally possess and develop competencies in a non-linear and contextual fashion that are required to facilitate constructive, bi-directional collaboration with other members of TS teams. Conclusions: Team science competencies across the career life course do not develop linearly among different constituency groups and require an adaptive framework to enhance TS team effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.