ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2024
Team science competencies for clinical research professionals: A multileveled Delphi approach.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implementation and early outcomes of a team science consultation service: Addressing key challenges in translational research collaborations.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Bridging sponsor-site operations through reciprocal on-site training of CRAs and CRCs: Impact on workflow knowledge and behavior among trial staff.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Developing the future clinical research workforce: An immersive high school clinical research summer camp.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Implementing TeamMAPPS: Formative qualitative findings from the dissemination and implementation study of a new evidence-based team science intervention.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Team science training for clinical and translational Scientists: An assessment of effectiveness.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Team science competencies across the career life course for translational science teams.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- Editorial: Building the clinical research workforce: challenges, capacities and competencies.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Education and training of clinical research professionals and the evolution of the Joint Task Force for Clinical Trial Competency.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Team science competencies for clinical research professionals: A multileveled Delphi approach.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The knowledge, skills, and abilities needed for clinical research professionals (CRPs) are described in the Joint Task Force (JTF) for Clinical Trial Competencies Framework as a basis for leveled educational programs, training curricula, and certification. There is a paucity of literature addressing team science competencies tailored to CRPs. Gaps in training, research, and education can restrict their capability to effectively contribute to team science. Materials/Methods: The CRP Team Science team consisted of 18 members from 7 clinical and translational science awarded institutions. We employed a multi-stage, modified Delphi approach to define "Smart Skills" and leveled team science skills examples using individual and team science competencies identified by Lotrecchiano et al. Results: Overall, 59 team science Smart Skills were identified resulting in 177 skills examples across three levels: fundamental, skilled, and advanced. Two examples of the leveled skillsets for individual and team competencies are illustrated. Two vignettes were created to illustrate application for training. Discussion: This work provides a first-ever application of team science for CRPs by defining specific individual and team science competencies for each level of the CRP career life course. This work will enhance the JTF Domains 7 (Leadership and Professionalism) and 8 (Communication and Teamwork) which are often lacking in CRP training programs. The supplement provides a full set of skills and examples from this work. Conclusion: Developing team science skills for CRPs may contribute to more effective collaborations across interdisciplinary clinical research teams. These skills may also improve research outcomes and stabilize the CRP workforce.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.