Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39655002›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2024

Team science competencies for clinical research professionals: A multileveled Delphi approach.

Angela Mendell, Jessica Fritter, Shirley Helm, Bernadette Capili, Laura Hildreth, Kathryn Johnson, Christa Varnadoe, Elizabeth Kopras, Jen Sprecher, Nicole Summerside and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Angela MendellUniversity of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0765-9479
Jessica FritterThe Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9995-4979
Shirley HelmVirginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8792-2047
Bernadette CapiliRockefeller University, New York, NY, USA.
Laura HildrethUniversity of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2031-7083
Kathryn JohnsonIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6157-3832
Christa VarnadoeUniversity of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3400-3931
Elizabeth KoprasUniversity of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5429-2609
Jen SprecherUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Nicole SummersideUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8386-1169
Karen CarterThe Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9418-6816
Andrea RonningRockefeller University, New York, NY, USA.
Nicole ExeUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8864-8327
H Robert KolbUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8267-2489
Carolynn T JonesThe Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0669-7860

Funding

The OSU Center for Clinical and Translational Science: Advancing Today's Discoveries to Improve HealthUM1TR004548 · NCATS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CYNTHIA A GERHARDT, JULIE A. JOHNSON · 2023 to 2026
$22.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004548
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The knowledge, skills, and abilities needed for clinical research professionals (CRPs) are described in the Joint Task Force (JTF) for Clinical Trial Competencies Framework as a basis for leveled educational programs, training curricula, and certification. There is a paucity of literature addressing team science competencies tailored to CRPs. Gaps in training, research, and education can restrict their capability to effectively contribute to team science. Materials/Methods: The CRP Team Science team consisted of 18 members from 7 clinical and translational science awarded institutions. We employed a multi-stage, modified Delphi approach to define "Smart Skills" and leveled team science skills examples using individual and team science competencies identified by Lotrecchiano et al. Results: Overall, 59 team science Smart Skills were identified resulting in 177 skills examples across three levels: fundamental, skilled, and advanced. Two examples of the leveled skillsets for individual and team competencies are illustrated. Two vignettes were created to illustrate application for training. Discussion: This work provides a first-ever application of team science for CRPs by defining specific individual and team science competencies for each level of the CRP career life course. This work will enhance the JTF Domains 7 (Leadership and Professionalism) and 8 (Communication and Teamwork) which are often lacking in CRP training programs. The supplement provides a full set of skills and examples from this work. Conclusion: Developing team science skills for CRPs may contribute to more effective collaborations across interdisciplinary clinical research teams. These skills may also improve research outcomes and stabilize the CRP workforce.

Indexed as

clinical research competenciesClinical research professionalinterdisciplinary teamsprofessional developmentteam science competencies

Identifiers

PMID39655002
PMCPMC11626577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.