ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2024
Comparative Evaluation of CEUS and CECT in the Detection of Liver Metastases of Middle and Low Rectal Cancer.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the imaging manifestations and clinical application value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in liver metastases of middle and low rectal cancer by performing CEUS in patients. Additionally, we compared the results of CEUS with those of abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) to assess the reliability of diagnosing liver metastases in patients with middle and low rectal cancer. Methods: Hepatic CEUS was performed in 1095 patients with middle and low rectal cancer, and all patients underwent abdominal CECT examinations to determine the presence or absence of liver metastases. The results of both examinations were compared to evaluate the value of hepatic CEUS for detecting liver metastases in patients with middle and low rectal cancer. Results: Among 1095 patients with middle and low rectal cancer, 132 were diagnosed with liver metastases of middle and low rectal cancer. 130 cases of liver metastases of rectal cancer were identified using hepatic CEUS, whereas 126 cases were identified using abdominal CECT. The detection rates of hepatic CEUS and abdominal CECT for liver metastases of middle and low rectal cancer showed no statistically significant differences ( Conclusion: Hepatic CEUS can be used to diagnose liver metastases in middle and low rectal cancer, providing crucial imaging evidence for clinical treatment planning. It exhibited higher sensitivity than that of abdominal CECT in diagnosing liver metastases of middle and low rectal cancer, enabling the identification of higher number of liver metastases of middle and low rectal cancer cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.