ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024
Bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study of atrial fibrillation and breast cancer.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Observational studies have shown an association between Breast Cancer (BC) and Atrial Fibrillation (AF). However, due to confounding factors and reverse causality, the causal role between BC and AF remains unclear. In this study, bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) combined with meta-analysis was used to evaluate the causal association between BC and AF. Methods: Based on the Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) summary data sets, the Inverse variance weighted (IVW) method was used as the main method, the weighted median method and MR-Egger method were used for Bidirectional Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization, and the Egger intercept test was used to detect horizontal pleiotropy. Heterogeneity was tested by Cochran's Q test, and sensitivity analysis was performed by "leave-one-out". GWAS data for AF and BC were obtained from three separate databases (FinnGen, UKBiobank, GWAScatalog) for European individuals. Finally, meta-analysis was performed on the MR Analysis results from different databases. Results: The pooled IVW results showed no evidence of an effect of BC on the risk of AF (IVW: OR = 0.9994; 95% CI = 0.9967-1.0022). There was also no evidence of an effect of AF on BC risk (IVW: OR = 0.9970; 95% CI = 0.9154-1.0859). Conclusion: The results of the Bidirectional Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization study show that there is no causal relationship between BC and AF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.