Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39654931›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024

Naila Kuhlmann, Aliki Thomas, Natalia Incio-Serra, Stefanie Blain-Moraes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Naila KuhlmannSchool of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Aliki ThomasSchool of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Natalia Incio-SerraSchool of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Stefanie Blain-MoraesSchool of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The subjective experience of illness is often overshadowed by the disease-and-cure focus of health research, contributing to the stigmatization of conditions such as Parkinson's disease and dementia. This is exacerbated by the fact that traditional means of knowledge dissemination are inaccessible to non-academic audiences, hampering meaningful dialogue with and research uptake by the broader community. Methods: Our arts-based knowledge translation project, Results: Responses indicated that both performances elicited strong emotional engagement and improved self-reported understanding and empathy towards individuals with Parkinson's and dementia. Based on a thematic analysis on open-ended questions, we consider the barriers and facilitators to the audience's receptiveness and discuss the performances' potential as a knowledge translation tool. Discussion: By presenting an emotionally engaging perspective on Parkinson's and dementia,

Indexed as

arts-based knowledge translationart-scienceaudience engagementcircusdementialived experienceParkinson’s diseaseperforming arts

Identifiers

PMID39654931
PMCPMC11627042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.