ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- KLRB1 gene in tumor immune regulation and disease prognosis: a multidimensional role review.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Unraveling the Clinical and Molecular Landscape of Myocardial Infarction in Behçet's Syndrome: A Comprehensive Analysis.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2025Article
- T cell-related diagnostic model and the underlying mechanism related to PRF1-mediated glycolysis in sepsis: evidences from single-cell, bulk transcriptomics, and experiment validation.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Potential of interleukin-7 in sepsis as a biomarker and therapeutic agent: a narrative review.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Identification and validation of core biomarkers for sepsis: a comprehensive analysis using bioinformatics and machine learning.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Sepsis is an unusual systemic reaction to what is sometimes an otherwise ordinary infection, and it probably represents a pattern of response by the immune system to injury. However, the relationship between biomarkers and sepsis remains unclear. This study aimed to find potential molecular biomarkers, which could do some help to patients with sepsis. Methods: The sepsis dataset GSE28750, GSE57065 was downloaded from the GEO database, and ten patients with or without sepsis from our hospital were admitted for RNA-seq and the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were screened. The Metascape database was used for functional enrichment analysis and was used to found the differential gene list. Protein-protein interaction network was used and further analyzed by using Cytoscape and STRING. Logistic regression and Correlation analysis were used to find the potential molecular biomarkers. Results: Taking the intersection of the three datasets yielded 287 differential genes. The enrichment results included Neutrophil degranulation, leukocyte activation, immune effectors process, positive regulation of immune response, regulation of leukocyte activation. The top 10 key genes of PPI connectivity were screened using cytoHubba plugin, which were Conclusion:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.