ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2024
Genetic characterization and clonal analysis of carbapenemase-producing
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Emergence ofCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), particularly carbapenemase-producing Methods: Fifty-two CRE isolates were collected from 477 clinical samples from dogs and humans at Chulalongkorn University between 2017-2021. Bacterial species were identified using MALDI-TOF, and antimicrobial resistance was confirmed through broth microdilution testing. Genetic analyses included plasmid replicon typing, multilocus sequence typing (MLST), whole genome sequencing (WGS), and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) to assess resistance genes and clonal relatedness. Results: CRE isolates from both species exhibited genetic variability with high ARG counts, particularly in human isolates. MLST identified ST410 in most E. coli isolates from both dogs and humans, and IncFIA/IncFIB plasmids were predominant among blaNDM-positive isolates. PFGE patterns and SNP analysis showed no clonal relationship between canine and human isolates, suggesting independent acquisition pathways for CRE in the two hosts. Discussion: The study highlights the absence of direct clonal transmission between canine and human isolates but reveals overlapping sequence types and plasmid types. The findings underscore the potential for interspecies transmission under certain conditions, emphasizing the importance of a One Health approach for monitoring CRE in both human and animal populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.