Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39654832›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of population data science2024

Determining households from patient addresses and unique property reference numbers in general practitioner electronic health records.

Gill Harper, Nicola Firman, Marta Wilk, Milena Marszalek, Paul Simon, David Stables, Richard Fry, Kelvin Smith, Carol Dezateux

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of population data science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Gill HarperClinical Effectiveness Group, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Nicola FirmanClinical Effectiveness Group, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Marta WilkClinical Effectiveness Group, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Milena MarszalekClinical Effectiveness Group, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Paul SimonEndeavour Health Charity, UK.
David StablesEndeavour Health Charity, UK.
Richard FryPopulation Data Science, Swansea University, UK.
Kelvin SmithClinical Effectiveness Group, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Carol DezateuxClinical Effectiveness Group, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Households are increasingly studied in population health research as an important context for understanding health and social behaviours and outcomes. Identifying household units of analysis in routinely collected data rather than traditional surveys requires innovative and standardised tools, which do not currently exist. Objectives: To design a utility that identifies households at a point in time from pseudonymised Unique Property Reference Numbers (UPRNs) known as Residential Anonymised Linkage Fields (RALFs) assigned to general practitioner (GP) patient addresses in electronic health records (EHRs) in north east London (NEL). Methods: Rule-based logic was developed to identify households based on GP registration, address date, and RALF validity. The logic was tested on a use case on the household clustering of childhood weight status, and bias in success of identifying households was examined in the use case cohort and in a full population cohort. Results: 92.1% of the use case cohort was assigned a household. The most frequent dominant reason (55.3%) for a household not assigned was that a person had no valid household RALFs available across their patient registration address records. Other reasons are having none or multiple valid household RALFs, or not being alive at the event date.In the use case, children not assigned to a household were more likely to attend schools in City & Hackney and living in the third most deprived quintile of lower super output areas.88.9% of the population cohort was assigned a household. Patients not assigned to a household were more likely to be aged 18 to 45 years, living in City & Hackney, and living in the second quintile of most deprived lower super output areas. Conclusions: We have developed a method for deriving households from primary care EHRs that can be implemented quickly and in real-time, providing timely data to support population health research on households.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsFamily CharacteristicsFemaleGeneral PractitionersHumansLondonelectronic health recordshouseholdspatient dataunique property reference numbers

Identifiers

PMID39654832
PMCPMC11626511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.