Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39654776›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Human health risks of lead, cadmium, and other heavy metals in lipsticks.

Selina Ama Saah, Nathaniel Owusu Boadi, Patrick Opare Sakyi, Euphemia Quanuaa Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Selina Ama SaahDepartment of Chemical Sciences, University of Energy and Natural Resources, Sunyani, Ghana.
Nathaniel Owusu BoadiDepartment of Chemistry, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
Patrick Opare SakyiDepartment of Chemical Sciences, University of Energy and Natural Resources, Sunyani, Ghana.
Euphemia Quanuaa SmithDepartment of Chemical Sciences, University of Energy and Natural Resources, Sunyani, Ghana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study investigates the concentration of heavy metals in various lipsticks sold in Ghana and assesses the potential health risks associated with their use. A total of 12 lipstick samples were analyzed using an X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analyzer for metals, including chromium (Cr), manganese (Mn), nickel (Ni), copper (Cu), cadmium (Cd), and lead (Pb). The findings revealed that Cr levels ranged from below detection limits to 2554.20 mg/kg, with five samples significantly exceeding the acceptable 1 mg/kg limit set by Health Canada. Mn concentrations varied from 0.09 mg/kg to 823.00 mg/kg, and Ni levels were detected up to 228.40 mg/kg, indicating potential risks of neurotoxicity and contact dermatitis. Cu was found in extremely high concentrations, particularly in samples S1 (14053.33 mg/kg) and S7 (1939.84 mg/kg), exceeding the acceptable 100 mg/kg limit, suggesting severe contamination and potential systemic toxicity. Cd concentrations in most samples surpassed the FDA limit of 3 mg/kg, posing risks of kidney damage. In comparison, Pb concentrations in several samples approached or exceeded the FDA limit of 10 mg/kg, indicating potential neurotoxic effects. Health risk assessments for dermal and oral exposure were conducted, with hazard quotients for non-carcinogenic risks remaining below 1, suggesting minimal immediate health risks. However, the relative intake indices (RII) for Cr, Cd, and Pb in oral risk assessments indicated significant exposure levels far exceeding acceptable daily intakes (ADI) for heavy users. These findings highlight the need for stricter regulation and consumer awareness of the potential dangers posed by heavy metals in cosmetics. Enhanced safety standards and regular monitoring are imperative to protect public health from the adverse effects of toxic metals in beauty products.

Indexed as

CosmeticsHeavy metalsLipstickRisk assessmentToxicity

Identifiers

PMID39654776
PMCPMC11625256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.