Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39654743›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

"

Pariwat Imsa-Ard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Pariwat Imsa-ArdFaculty of Liberal Arts, Thammasat University, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gaining insight into the personal experiences of boredom in foreign language (FL) learning is essential for delivering lessons that reduce boredom and enhance the overall learning experience for students. This study explores the views of Thai EFL university students on Foreign Language Learning Boredom (FLLB) using Q methodology. A total of 36 students participated in a Q-sort involving 44 FLLB-related statements, and the data was analysed using Principal Component Analysis and varimax rotation. Additionally, retrospective interviews with six participants provided deeper insights. The study identified three primary factors shaping and influencing FLLB:

Indexed as

EFL learningFL boredomInfluencing factorsQ methodologyThai learnersUndergraduate students

Identifiers

PMID39654743
PMCPMC11625267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.