Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39654737›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Balance equations for physics-informed machine learning.

Sandor M Molnar, Joseph Godfrey, Binyang Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sandor M MolnarInstitute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Joseph GodfreyVirginia Tech, Falls Church, VA, USA.
Binyang SongVirginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using traditional machine learning (ML) methods may produce results that are inconsistent with the laws of physics. In contrast, physics-based models of complex physical, biological, or engineering systems incorporate the laws of physics as constraints on ML methods by introducing loss terms, ensuring that the results are consistent with these laws. However, accurately deriving the nonlinear and high order differential equations to enforce various complex physical laws is non-trivial. There is a lack of comprehensive guidance on the formulation of residual loss terms. To address this challenge, this paper proposes a new framework based on the balance equations, which aims to advance the development of PIML across multiple domains by providing a systematic approach to constructing residual loss terms that maintain the physical integrity of PDE solutions. The proposed balance equation method offers a unified treatment of all the fundamental equations of classical physics used in models of mechanical, electrical, and chemical systems and guides the derivation of differential equations for embedding physical laws in ML models. We show that all of these equations can be derived from a single equation known as the generic balance equation, in conjunction with specific constitutive relations that bind the balance equation to a particular domain. We also provide a few simple worked examples how to use our balance equation method in practice for PIML. Our approach suggests that a single framework can be followed to incorporate physics into ML models. This level of generalization may provide the basis for more efficient methods of developing physics-based ML for complex systems.

Indexed as

Balance equationsComputational methodologiesElasticityElectrodynamicsFluid dynamicsMachine learningPhysics-informed systemsThermodynamics

Identifiers

PMID39654737
PMCPMC11626790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.