Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39654720›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2024

Review on the impact of heavy metals from industrial wastewater effluent and removal technologies.

T E Oladimeji, M Oyedemi, M E Emetere, O Agboola, J B Adeoye, O A Odunlami

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. PRISMA-based review ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Deciphering the role of human peroxiredoxins for combating lead and zinc mediated cellular toxicity using a yeast model.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

T E OladimejiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Covenant University, Ota, Ogun state, Nigeria.
M OyedemiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Covenant University, Ota, Ogun state, Nigeria.
M E EmetereDepartment of Physics, Bowen University, Osun State, Nigeria.
O AgboolaDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Covenant University, Ota, Ogun state, Nigeria.
J B AdeoyeDepartment of Chemical and Energy Engineering, Curtin University, Malaysia.
O A OdunlamiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Covenant University, Ota, Ogun state, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of water pollution in developing countries is high due to the lack of regulatory policies and laws that protect water bodies from anthropogenic activities and industrial wastewater. Industrial wastewater contains significant amounts of heavy metals that are detrimental to human health, aquatic organisms, and the ecosystem. The focus of this review was to evaluate the sources and treatment methods of wastewater, with an emphasis on technologies, advantages, disadvantages, and innovation. It was observed that conventional methods of wastewater treatment (such as flotation, coagulation/flocculation, and adsorption) had shown promising results but posed certain limitations, such as the generation of high volumes of sludge, relatively low removal rates, inefficiency in treating low metal concentrations, and sensitivity to varying pH. Recent technologies like nanotechnology, photocatalysis, and electrochemical coagulation have significant advantages over conventional methods for removing heavy metals, including higher removal rates, improved energy efficiency, and greater selectivity for specific contaminants. However, the high costs associated with these advanced methods remain a major drawback. Therefore, we recommend that future developments in wastewater treatment technology focus on reducing both costs and waste generation.

Indexed as

EffluentsHeavy metalsImpactRemoval technologiesWastewaterWater pollution

Identifiers

PMID39654720
PMCPMC11625160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.