Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39654697›Full record

ArticleDelirium (Bielefeld, Germany)2023

Delirium is under-reported in discharge summaries and in hospital administrative systems: a systematic review.

Temi Ibitoye, Sabrina So, Susan D Shenkin, Atul Anand, Matthew J Reed, Emma R L C Vardy, Sarah T Pendelbury, Alasdair M J MacLullich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Delirium (Bielefeld, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Effect of hospital-acquired complications on hospital length of stay and cost for older adults after a hip fracture in New South Wales, Australia.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Temi IbitoyeEdinburgh Delirium Research Group, Ageing and Health, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8571-988X
Sabrina SoEdinburgh Royal Infirmary, NHS Lothian.
Susan D ShenkinEdinburgh Delirium Group, Ageing and Health, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7375-4776
Atul AnandCentre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6428-4554
Matthew J ReedAcute Care Edinburgh, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1308-4824
Emma R L C VardySalford Care Organisation, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3457-9757
Sarah T PendelburyNIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3603-8388
Alasdair M J MacLullichEdinburgh Delirium Research Group, Ageing and Health, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3159-9370

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Accurate recording of delirium in discharge summaries (DS) and hospital administrative systems (HAS) is critical for patient care. Objective: To systematically review studies reporting the frequency of delirium documentation and coding in DS and HAS, respectively. Method: We searched Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and Web of Science databases from inception to 23 June 2021. Eligibility criteria included requiring the term Results: The search yielded 7,910 results; 24 studies were included. The studies were heterogeneous in design and size (N=25 to 809,512). Mean age ranged from 57 to 84 years. Four studies reported only overall DS documentation and HAS coding in whole hospital or healthcare databases. Twenty studies used additional delirium ascertainment methods (e.g. chart review) in smaller patient subsets. Studies reported either DS figures only (N=8), HAS figures only (N=11), or both (N=5). Documentation rates in DS ranged from 0.1% to 64%. Coding rates in HAS ranged from 1.5% to 49%. Some studies explored the impact of race, and nurse versus physician practice. No significant differences were reported for race; one study reported that nurses showed higher documentation rates in DS relative to physicians. Most studies (N=22) had medium to high RoB. Conclusion: Delirium is a common and serious medical emergency, yet studies show considerable under-documentation and under-coding in healthcare systems. This has important implications for patient care and service planning. Healthcare systems need to take action to reach satisfactory delirium documentation and coding rates.

Indexed as

deliriumdischarge summariesgeriatrichealthcare coding

Identifiers

PMID39654697
PMCPMC7617113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.