Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39654687›Full record

ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2024

Consensus Recommendations for the Reconstitution and Aesthetic Use of Poly-D,L-Lactic Acid Microspheres.

Fabiano Nadson Magacho-Vieira, Abrahao Osta Vieira, Amarilho Soares, Hellise Christine Lana Alvarenga, Iran Roger Alkimin de Oliveira Junior, João Antonio Correa Daher, João Vitor Moraes Pithon Napoli, Júlia Portocarrero de Almeida Serra, Suellen Costa Provázio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fabiano Nadson Magacho-VieiraMagacho Institute for Health Education, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1083-9622
Abrahao Osta VieiraClínica Abrahão Osta, Pedro Leopoldo, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0005-1261-0927
Amarilho SoaresClínica Amarilho Jr, Americana, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0008-0886-4248
Hellise Christine Lana AlvarengaNúcleo Lana, Nova Lima, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0008-8804-9082
Iran Roger Alkimin de Oliveira JuniorIran Alkimin Dermatologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0004-7500-6316
João Antonio Correa DaherDaher Núcleo de Estética, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0007-5791-3678
João Vitor Moraes Pithon NapoliInstituto Pithon Napoli, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4542-132X
Júlia Portocarrero de Almeida SerraJS Dermatologia, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0005-8746-6659
Suellen Costa ProvázioInstituto Pedro Miranda, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0009-0125-8293

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poly-D,L-lactic acid (PDLLA) microspheres, marketed globally as Aesthefill

Indexed as

collagen stimulatorconsensusexpert recommendationsfillerpoly-D,L-lactic acidpolylactic acid

Identifiers

PMID39654687
PMCPMC11626391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.