ReviewMedComm2024
Cerebral vascular malformations: pathogenesis and therapy.
Review in MedComm, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cerebrovascular malformations different from AVMs in patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia: a systematic review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Pooled it
- Reprogramming immunometabolism: linking nutrient sensing, cell death, and therapeutic innovation.Immunologic research · 2026Review
- Article
- CXCL13⁺ CD4⁺ T cells are associated with B-cell recruitment and lesion progression in cerebral cavernous malformations.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2026Article
- MEKK3 bridges gut-brain communication and cerebral cavernous malformation pathogenesis.Cell death discovery · 2026Review
- Shifts in immunometabolism in autoimmune diseases.Immunologic research · 2026Review
- The Role of Immune Infiltration and Oxidative Stress in the Progression of Cerebral Cavernous Malformation.Brain and behavior · 2026Review
- Autologous skull graft resorption following cranioplasty: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerebral vascular malformations (CVMs), particularly cerebral cavernous malformations and cerebral arteriovenous malformations, pose significant neurological challenges due to their complex etiologies and clinical implications. Traditionally viewed as congenital conditions with structural abnormalities, CVMs have been treated primarily through resection, embolization, and stereotactic radiosurgery. While these approaches offer some efficacy, they often pose risks to neurological integrity due to their invasive nature. Advances in next-generation sequencing, particularly high-depth whole-exome sequencing and bioinformatics, have facilitated the identification of gene variants from neurosurgically resected CVMs samples. These advancements have deepened our understanding of CVM pathogenesis. Somatic mutations in key mechanistic pathways have been identified as causative factors, leading to a paradigm shift in CVM treatment. Additionally, recent progress in noninvasive and minimally invasive techniques, including gene imaging genomics, liquid biopsy, or endovascular biopsies (endovascular sampling of blood vessel lumens), has enabled the identification of gene variants associated with CVMs. These methods, in conjunction with clinical data, offer potential for early detection, dynamic monitoring, and targeted therapies that could be used as monotherapy or adjuncts to surgery. This review highlights advancements in CVM pathogenesis and precision therapies, outlining the future potential of precision medicine in CVM management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.