Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39654611›Full record

ArticleObesity science & practice2024

A Pilot Study of a Novel Dietary Intervention Targeting Ultra-Processed Food Intake.

Charlotte J Hagerman, Asher E Hong, Emma Jennings, Meghan L Butryn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity science & practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The role of ultra-processed food in obesity.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Charlotte J HagermanCenter for Weight, Eating, and Lifestyle Science Drexel University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
Asher E HongCenter for Weight, Eating, and Lifestyle Science Drexel University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
Emma JenningsCenter for Weight, Eating, and Lifestyle Science Drexel University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
Meghan L ButrynCenter for Weight, Eating, and Lifestyle Science Drexel University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ultra-processed foods (UPFs) are harmful to health but ubiquitous in the modern food environment, comprising almost 60% of the average American diet. This study assessed the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a novel behavioral intervention designed to reduce UPF intake. Methods: Fourteen adults participated in an 8-week pilot intervention, which consisted of weekly group sessions, individual meal planning sessions, and financial support. Dietary intake was assessed using three Automated Self-Administered 24-h Dietary Recalls (ASA24) at both baseline and post-treatment. Results: The intervention was highly feasible and acceptable. Qualitative data demonstrated that participants were enthusiastic about the benefits of reducing UPF intake and found the intervention highly valuable. Participants reduced average daily calories from UPF by 48.9%, number of UPFs consumed by almost half, total daily calorie intake by 612 calories/day, sodium consumption by 37% and sugar consumption by 50%. There were no significant changes in fruit or vegetable intake. Participants lost an average of 3.5 kg (SD = 3.0 kg). Conclusion: This pilot data suggests that behavioral interventions to reduce UPF intake will be well-received and are capable of success despite the barriers of the United States food environment. Future research should prioritize behavioral interventions targeting UPF consumption alongside policy changes.

Indexed as

behavioral interventiondietary qualityobesityultra‐processed foodsweight loss

Identifiers

PMID39654611
PMCPMC11625872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.