Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39654610›Full record

ArticleFuture healthcare journal2025

Does online case-based learning foster clinical reasoning skills? A mixed-methods study.

Jun Jie Lim, Bhavani Veasuvalingam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Future healthcare journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jun Jie LimSchool of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Bhavani VeasuvalingamInternational Medical University Centre for Education, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Blended learning, integrating face-to-face and virtual methods, has become essential in clinical education, enhancing student satisfaction, engagement and knowledge outcomes. Particularly, online case-based learning emerges as a promising pedagogy to foster clinical reasoning skills. Despite the well-documented clinical reasoning cultivation through face-to-face case-based learning, the ability of online case-based learning to cultivate clinical reasoning remains unexplored. This study investigates the role of online case-based learning in fostering clinical reasoning skills among clinical-year medical students. Methods: A mixed-methods sequential explanatory research study was adopted. In the first phase, quantitative data were gathered through a 16-item Likert scale questionnaire adapted from validated clinical reasoning questionnaires. In the second phase, focus group discussions were conducted to expand on the understanding of quantitative results. Results: In total, 160 students completed the questionnaire (45% response rate), and 26 participated in focus group discussions. Participants agreed that online case-based learning fostered clinical reasoning skills (mean = 2.94) through different formats, such as clinical role play, simulated ward rounds and virtual consultation. Compared to face-to-face clinical teaching, the focus group revealed that participants were allowed to practise giving explanations to patients, engage in more in-depth discussions, and receive more comprehensive feedback on their clinical reasoning skills during online case-based learning. The barriers to online clinical reasoning skills development were poorer communication skills development and reduced student engagement. The lack of patient complexities of cases and the inability to perform physical examinations hindered students' clinical reasoning ability. Suggestions to improve clinical reasoning cultivation include utilising actual patient cases, increasing case complexity and session interactivity. Conclusion: This study highlights how online case-based learning can support the development of clinical reasoning skills in medical students, encouraging future educators to adopt a blended learning approach. Future research should focus on objective assessments, long-term impacts and innovative methods to improve clinical reasoning skill development continuously.

Indexed as

Blended learningCase-based discussionClinical educationClinical reasoningMedical educationMedical student

Identifiers

PMID39654610
PMCPMC11625323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.