ArticleRadiology case reports2025
Fat embolism syndrome following femoral shaft fracture: A case report and diagnostic considerations.
Article in Radiology case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances and uncertainties in fat embolism syndrome: a review.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fat embolism syndrome (FES) is a rare but serious complication that can arise after long bone fractures or orthopedic surgeries. This case report presents a 40-year-old male who developed FES following surgical fixation of a femoral shaft fracture using 2 plates. The day after surgery, the patient exhibited tachycardia, respiratory distress, and a fever of 38.5°C, initially raising concerns for pulmonary embolism. A computed tomography (CT) angiography of the lungs showed no evidence of pulmonary thromboembolism, and methylprednisolone was administered due to the suspicion of fat embolism. On the second postoperative day, petechial and purpuric lesions appeared on the neck, chest, and the surgical limb, strengthening the suspicion for FES. The patient fulfilled 2 major and 3 minor criteria for FES according to the Gurd and Wilson criteria, and scored 8 points on the Schonfeld Fat Embolism Index, indicating a high likelihood of FES. Despite these clinical signs, imaging studies did not reveal any embolic events. The patient was treated with supportive care, including oxygen therapy and anticoagulation, and his condition stabilized over the next 24 hours. He was mobilized and discharged in stable condition. This case highlights the critical need for early recognition of fat embolism syndrome (FES) in postorthopedic surgery patients, as timely diagnosis and intervention are key to preventing serious complications. Although clinical signs may not always align with imaging results, vigilant monitoring and prompt supportive care can significantly improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.