ArticleRadiology case reports2025
Successful esophagotomy after failed attempts of esophagoscopic retrieval of impacted denture.
Article in Radiology case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ingested foreign bodies, although fairly common among children, can present in individuals of all age. Most common risk factors for such cases in adults include psychiatric illness, alcohol abuse and ill-fitting dentures. Most of the ingested foreign bodies pass through the gastrointestinal tract but intervention maybe required in case of impaction, obstruction or perforation. Foreign bodies mostly tend to get impacted at anatomical constrictions like cricopharyngeus, aortic arch and lower esophageal sphincter. We present a rare case of impacted denture in esophagus which could not be retrieved despite multiple esophagoscopic retrieval attempts leading to removal by successful esophagotomy. Investigations including X-ray and rigid esophagoscopy confirmed the presence of denture with its hooks impacted in the esophageal wall at the level of C6-C7 vertebra. Majority of the foreign bodies can be removed by flexible endoscopy or esophagoscopy but due to its impaction in esophageal wall these techniques were unsuccessful. Therefore, multidisciplinary team decided to opt for an esophagotomy with transcervical approach. Successful esophagotomy was performed with the retrieval of sharp hook like body. Our case underscores the importance of early surgical intervention in case of failed attempt to remove the foreign body through minimally invasive techniques to prevent complications in form of perforation and mediastinitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.