ReviewCytotechnology2025
Animal origins free products in cell culture media: a new frontier.
Review in Cytotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Food-grade utilization of bovine slaughterhouse by-products for developing cost-effective media supplements in cultivated meat applications.Food science of animal resources · 2026Review
- Exploring ethical, sustainable and effective foetal bovine serum alternatives forFrontiers in toxicology · 2026Review
- Development of Cell Culture Media for Cultivated Meat Production.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2026Review
- Mechanisms of mTORC1 and GCN2 amino acid sensing pathways in tumorigenesis and metastatic progression (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Effects of low-serum adaptation on growth and protein expression in stably lactoferrin-overexpressing mammary alveolar cells.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Article
- Scaffold-free cell sheet therapies: clinical advances, global approval landscapes, and strategic directions to address regenerative medicine barriers.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the importance of finding replacements for fetal bovine serum (FBS), very few studies have focused on this subject. Historically, the use of animals and their derivatives in growth, reproduction, and physiological studies has raised several concerns. The supplementation of culture media with FBS, also known as fetal calf serum, continues to be widespread, despite its limitations in quality, reproducibility, and implications for animal welfare. Moreover, the presence of counterfeit and illegal products can adversely affect cell cultures and treatments, prompting the search for alternative solutions. To reduce reliance on FBS, various substitutes have been introduced, such as plant-derived proteins, bovine eye fluid, sericin protein, human platelet lysate, and inactivated coelomic fluid, which can provide roles similar to that of FBS. Therefore, it is essential to develop serum-free and animal supplement-free environments suitable for therapeutic and clinical applications, tailored to the specific needs of different cell types. Among the alternatives, plant-based options have gained attention as sustainable and ethical solutions. These include plant-derived peptones from sources like soy and wheat, which are rich in amino acids and peptides essential for mammalian cell growth, as well as plant protein hydrolysates from beans and peas that serve as sources of amino acids and growth factors. Plant extracts, especially from soy and various seeds, contain necessary proteins and growth factors, while phytohormones such as cytokinins and plant polysaccharides can help regulate cell growth. While these alternatives offer benefits like reduced costs and lower risks of disease transmission, further research is necessary to refine and align them with the specific requirements of diverse cell types. Graphical abstract:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.