ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2024
Toward explainable deep learning in healthcare through transition matrix and user-friendly features.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Imaging: Current Landscape, Clinical Impact, and Future Directions.Discoveries (Craiova, Romania)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Modern artificial intelligence (AI) solutions often face challenges due to the "black box" nature of deep learning (DL) models, which limits their transparency and trustworthiness in critical medical applications. In this study, we propose and evaluate a scalable approach based on a transition matrix to enhance the interpretability of DL models in medical signal and image processing by translating complex model decisions into user-friendly and justifiable features for healthcare professionals. The criteria for choosing interpretable features were clearly defined, incorporating clinical guidelines and expert rules to align model outputs with established medical standards. The proposed approach was tested on two medical datasets: electrocardiography (ECG) for arrhythmia detection and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for heart disease classification. The performance of the DL models was compared with expert annotations using Cohen's Kappa coefficient to assess agreement, achieving coefficients of 0.89 for the ECG dataset and 0.80 for the MRI dataset. These results demonstrate strong agreement, underscoring the reliability of the approach in providing accurate, understandable, and justifiable explanations of DL model decisions. The scalability of the approach suggests its potential applicability across various medical domains, enhancing the generalizability and utility of DL models in healthcare while addressing practical challenges and ethical considerations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.