ArticleInternational journal of cancer2025
Search for germline gene variants in colorectal cancer families presenting with multiple primary colorectal cancers.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A comprehensive genomic framework for identifying genes predisposing to homologous recombination repair-deficient breast or ovarian cancer.BJC reports · 2026Article
- Familial colorectal cancer: search for novel predisposition genes.Human genomics · 2025Article
- Search for germline gene variants in colorectal cancer families presenting with multiple primary colorectal cancers.International journal of cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A double primary colorectal cancer (CRC) in a familial setting signals a high risk of CRC. In order to identify novel CRC susceptibility genes, we whole-exome sequenced germline DNA from nine persons with a double primary CRC and a family history of CRC. The detected variants were processed by bioinformatics filtering and prioritization, including STRING protein-protein interaction and pathway analysis. A total of 150 missense, 19 stop-gain, 22 frameshift and 13 canonical splice site variants fulfilled our filtering criteria. The STRING analysis identified 20 DNA repair/cell cycle proteins as the main cluster, related to genes CHEK2, EXO1, FAAP24, FANCI, MCPH1, POLL, PRC1, RECQL, RECQL5, RRM2, SHCBP1, SMC2, XRCC1, in addition to CDK18, ENDOV, ZW10 and the known mismatch repair genes. Another STRING network included extracellular matrix genes and TGFβ signaling genes. In the nine whole-exome sequenced patients, eight harbored at least two candidate DNA repair/cell cycle/TGFβ signaling gene variants. The number of families is too small to provide evidence for individual variants but, considering the known role of DNA repair/cell cycle genes in CRC, the clustering of multiple deleterious variants in the present families suggests that these, perhaps jointly, contributed to CRC development in these families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.