Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39654412›Full record

ArticleEncephalitis (Seoul, Korea)2025

Tandem repeat disorders: from diagnosis to emerging therapeutic strategies.

Jangsup Moon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Encephalitis (Seoul, Korea), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jangsup MoonRare Disease Center, Department of Genomic Medicine; Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tandem repeat disorders (TRDs) are genetic conditions characterized by the abnormal expansion of repetitive DNA sequences within specific genes. The growing number of identified TRDs highlights their complexity, with varied molecular mechanisms ranging from toxic protein production and repeat-associated non-AUG translation to RNA toxicity and epigenetic modifications. TRDs also exhibit unique clinical features such as reduced penetrance, anticipation, and repeat motif changes. Advances in molecular diagnostics such as long-read sequencing have significantly improved the detection of TRDs, especially for large or complex repeat expansions. Additionally, emerging therapeutic strategies, particularly antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) and gene editing technologies, are showing great promise. ASOs in particular have demonstrated success through mechanisms like allele-specific knockdown and splice modulation. In this review, we explore the classification of TRDs, advances in diagnostics, molecular mechanisms, clinical features, and innovative therapeutic strategies, highlighting the need for further research to refine treatments and improve outcomes.

Indexed as

Antisense oligonucleotidesDNA repeat expansionGene editingGenetic testingTrinucleotide repeat expansion

Identifiers

PMID39654412
PMCPMC12042693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.