ReviewMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2024
Evaluating Lipiodol Efficacy in Proximal Tubal Occlusion Treatment: Single-Center Experience and Literature Review.
Review in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tubal infertility caused by proximal occlusion of fallopian tubes is a common cause of female infertility. Lipiodol (ethiodized oil) is an oil-based iodinated contrast medium, previously used in hysterosalpingography, and is now used as a therapeutic agent. This single-center study aimed to evaluate the experience of outcomes from the use of Lipiodol in 96 women with infertility due to fallopian tube occlusion. MATERIAL AND METHODS In total, 96 women with infertility caused by tubal obstruction, confirmed in hysterosalpingography and/or laparoscopy, who underwent tubal recanalization followed by Lipiodol injection were enrolled. Information regarding the reproductive outcome at a minimum of 6 months following the treatment was collected by a telephone survey or direct contact. Pregnancy rate was calculated. RESULTS Average age on admission was 33±4.1 years. In most cases (79%, 76/96), infertility was primary. Average duration of infertility was 2.8 years. Comorbidities included endocrinopathies and endometriosis. Complete patency was achieved in 96% of cases (92/96 patients). In 4 cases (4%), distal occlusion of 1 ovary was observed, resulting in partial procedural success. Tubal catheterization was needed in 29 patients (30%). No procedural complications were noted. Thirty-four patients conceived, resulting in a 35.8% pregnancy rate. Miscarriage was noted in 5 patients, and tubal ectopic pregnancy in 1 patient. No long-term complications were reported. CONCLUSIONS Our results show that use of oil-based contrast for tubal recanalization is safe and effective treatment for proximal tubal occlusion, with a relatively high pregnancy rate (36%). Further studies are required to fully discover its potential benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.