Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39654058›Full record

ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2024

Be aware of overfitting by hyperparameter optimization!

Igor V Tetko, Ruud van Deursen, Guillaume Godin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Combined Modeling Approaches for Assessing Sodium-Iodide Symporter Inhibition.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Early Sound-Based Meal Onset Detection Using Hidden Markov Models (HMMs).IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Igor V TetkoInstitute of Structural Biology, Molecular Targets and Therapeutics Center, Helmholtz Munich - Deutsches Forschungszentrum Für Gesundheit Und Umwelt (GmbH), 86764, Neuherberg, Germany. igor.tetko@helmholtz-munich.de.
Ruud van DeursenDSM-Firmenich SA, Rue de la Bergère 7, Satigny, Switzerland.
Guillaume GodinOsmo Labs, PBC, 450 E 29th St, New York, USA. guillaume.godin@gmail.com.

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 956832
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hyperparameter optimization is very frequently employed in machine learning. However, an optimization of a large space of parameters could result in overfitting of models. In recent studies on solubility prediction the authors collected seven thermodynamic and kinetic solubility datasets from different data sources. They used state-of-the-art graph-based methods and compared models developed for each dataset using different data cleaning protocols and hyperparameter optimization. In our study we showed that hyperparameter optimization did not always result in better models, possibly due to overfitting when using the same statistical measures. Similar results could be calculated using pre-set hyperparameters, reducing the computational effort by around 10,000 times. We also extended the previous analysis by adding a representation learning method based on Natural Language Processing of smiles called Transformer CNN. We show that across all analyzed sets using exactly the same protocol, Transformer CNN provided better results than graph-based methods for 26 out of 28 pairwise comparisons by using only a tiny fraction of time as compared to other methods. Last but not least we stressed the importance of comparing calculation results using exactly the same statistical measures.Scientific Contribution We showed that models with pre-optimized hyperparameters can suffer from overfitting and that using pre-set hyperparameters yields similar performances but four orders faster. Transformer CNN provided significantly higher accuracy compared to other investigated methods.

Identifiers

PMID39654058
PMCPMC11629497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.